Files
palladum-lightning/plugins/askrene/child/mcf.c

1642 lines
52 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#include "config.h"
#include <assert.h>
#include <ccan/asort/asort.h>
#include <ccan/bitmap/bitmap.h>
#include <ccan/list/list.h>
#include <ccan/tal/str/str.h>
#include <ccan/tal/tal.h>
#include <common/utils.h>
#include <float.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/askrene.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/algorithm.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/child_log.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/dijkstra.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/explain_failure.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/flow.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/graph.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/mcf.h>
#include <plugins/askrene/child/refine.h>
#include <stdint.h>
/* # Optimal payments
*
* In this module we reduce the routing optimization problem to a linear
* cost optimization problem and find a solution using MCF algorithms.
* The optimization of the routing itself doesn't need a precise numerical
* solution, since we can be happy near optimal results; e.g. paying 100 msat or
* 101 msat for fees doesn't make any difference if we wish to deliver 1M sats.
* On the other hand, we are now also considering Pickhard's
* [1] model to improve payment reliability,
* hence our optimization moves to a 2D space: either we like to maximize the
* probability of success of a payment or minimize the routing fees, or
* alternatively we construct a function of the two that gives a good compromise.
*
* Therefore from now own, the definition of optimal is a matter of choice.
* To simplify the API of this module, we think the best way to state the
* problem is:
*
* Find a routing solution that pays the least of fees while keeping
* the probability of success above a certain value `min_probability`.
*
*
* # Fee Cost
*
* Routing fees is non-linear function of the payment flow x, that's true even
* without the base fee:
*
* fee_msat = base_msat + floor(millionths*x_msat / 10^6)
*
* We approximate this fee into a linear function by computing a slope `c_fee` such
* that:
*
* fee_microsat = c_fee * x_sat
*
* Function `linear_fee_cost` computes `c_fee` based on the base and
* proportional fees of a channel.
* The final product if microsat because if only
* the proportional fee was considered we can have c_fee = millionths.
* Moving to costs based in msats means we have to either truncate payments
* below 1ksats or estimate as 0 cost for channels with less than 1000ppm.
*
* TODO(eduardo): shall we build a linear cost function in msats?
*
* # Probability cost
*
* The probability of success P of the payment is the product of the prob. of
* success of forwarding parts of the payment over all routing channels. This
* problem is separable if we log it, and since we would like to increase P,
* then we can seek to minimize -log(P), and that's our prob. cost function [1].
*
* - log P = sum_{i} - log P_i
*
* The probability of success `P_i` of sending some flow `x` on a channel with
* liquidity l in the range a<=l<b is
*
* P_{a,b}(x) = (b-x)/(b-a); for x > a
* = 1. ; for x <= a
*
* Notice that unlike the similar formula in [1], the one we propose does not
* contain the quantization shot noise for counting states. The formula remains
* valid independently of the liquidity units (sats or msats).
*
* The cost associated to probability P is then -k log P, where k is some
* constant. For k=1 we get the following table:
*
* prob | cost
* -----------
* 0.01 | 4.6
* 0.02 | 3.9
* 0.05 | 3.0
* 0.10 | 2.3
* 0.20 | 1.6
* 0.50 | 0.69
* 0.80 | 0.22
* 0.90 | 0.10
* 0.95 | 0.05
* 0.98 | 0.02
* 0.99 | 0.01
*
* Clearly -log P(x) is non-linear; we try to linearize it piecewise:
* split the channel into 4 arcs representing 4 liquidity regions:
*
* arc_0 -> [0, a)
* arc_1 -> [a, a+(b-a)*f1)
* arc_2 -> [a+(b-a)*f1, a+(b-a)*f2)
* arc_3 -> [a+(b-a)*f2, a+(b-a)*f3)
*
* where f1 = 0.5, f2 = 0.8, f3 = 0.95;
* We fill arc_0's capacity with complete certainty P=1, then if more flow is
* needed we start filling the capacity in arc_1 until the total probability
* of success reaches P=0.5, then arc_2 until P=1-0.8=0.2, and finally arc_3 until
* P=1-0.95=0.05. We don't go further than 5% prob. of success per channel.
* TODO(eduardo): this channel linearization is hard coded into
* `CHANNEL_PIVOTS`, maybe we can parametrize this to take values from the config file.
*
* With this choice, the slope of the linear cost function becomes:
*
* m_0 = 0
* m_1 = 1.38 k /(b-a)
* m_2 = 3.05 k /(b-a)
* m_3 = 9.24 k /(b-a)
*
* Notice that one of the assumptions in [2] for the MCF problem is that flows
* and the slope of the costs functions are integer numbers. The only way we
* have at hand to make it so, is to choose a universal value of `k` that scales
* up the slopes so that floor(m_i) is not zero for every arc.
*
* # Combine fee and prob. costs
*
* We attempt to solve the original problem of finding the solution that
* pays the least fees while keeping the prob. of success above a certain value,
* by constructing a cost function which is a linear combination of fee and
* prob. costs.
* TODO(eduardo): investigate how this procedure is justified,
* possibly with the use of Lagrange optimization theory.
*
* At first, prob. and fee costs live in different dimensions, they cannot be
* summed, it's like comparing apples and oranges.
* However we propose to scale the prob. cost by a global factor k that
* translates into the monetization of prob. cost.
*
* This was chosen empirically from examination of typical network values.
*
* # References
*
* [1] Pickhardt and Richter, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05322
* [2] R.K. Ahuja, T.L. Magnanti, and J.B. Orlin. Network Flows:
* Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, 1993.
*
*
* TODO(eduardo) it would be interesting to see:
* how much do we pay for reliability?
* Cost_fee(most reliable solution) - Cost_fee(cheapest solution)
*
* TODO(eduardo): it would be interesting to see:
* how likely is the most reliable path with respect to the cheapest?
* Prob(reliable)/Prob(cheapest) = Exp(Cost_prob(cheapest)-Cost_prob(reliable))
*
* */
#define PARTS_BITS 2
#define CHANNEL_PARTS (1 << PARTS_BITS)
// These are the probability intervals we use to decompose a channel into linear
// cost function arcs.
static const double CHANNEL_PIVOTS[]={0,0.5,0.8,0.95};
static const s64 INFINITE = INT64_MAX;
static const s64 MU_MAX = 100;
/* every payment under 1000sat will be routed through a single path */
static const struct amount_msat SINGLE_PATH_THRESHOLD = AMOUNT_MSAT(1000000);
/* Let's try this encoding of arcs:
* Each channel `c` has two possible directions identified by a bit
* `half` or `!half`, and each one of them has to be
* decomposed into 4 liquidity parts in order to
* linearize the cost function, but also to solve MCF
* problem we need to keep track of flows in the
* residual network hence we need for each directed arc
* in the network there must be another arc in the
* opposite direction refered to as it's dual. In total
* 1+2+1 additional bits of information:
*
* (chan_idx)(half)(part)(dual)
*
* That means, for each channel we need to store the
* information of 16 arcs. If we implement a convex-cost
* solver then we can reduce that number to size(half)size(dual)=4.
*
* In the adjacency of a `node` we are going to store
* the outgoing arcs. If we ever need to loop over the
* incoming arcs then we will define a reverse adjacency
* API.
* Then for each outgoing channel `(c,half)` there will
* be 4 parts for the actual residual capacity, hence
* with the dual bit set to 0:
*
* (c,half,0,0)
* (c,half,1,0)
* (c,half,2,0)
* (c,half,3,0)
*
* and also we need to consider the dual arcs
* corresponding to the channel direction `(c,!half)`
* (the dual has reverse direction):
*
* (c,!half,0,1)
* (c,!half,1,1)
* (c,!half,2,1)
* (c,!half,3,1)
*
* These are the 8 outgoing arcs relative to `node` and
* associated with channel `c`. The incoming arcs will
* be:
*
* (c,!half,0,0)
* (c,!half,1,0)
* (c,!half,2,0)
* (c,!half,3,0)
*
* (c,half,0,1)
* (c,half,1,1)
* (c,half,2,1)
* (c,half,3,1)
*
* but they will be stored as outgoing arcs on the peer
* node `next`.
*
* I hope this will clarify my future self when I forget.
*
* */
/*
* We want to use the whole number here for convenience, but
* we can't us a union, since bit order is implementation-defined and
* we want chanidx on the highest bits:
*
* [ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 31 ]
* dual part chandir chanidx
*/
#define ARC_DUAL_BITOFF (0)
#define ARC_PART_BITOFF (1)
#define ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF (1 + PARTS_BITS)
#define ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF (1 + PARTS_BITS + 1)
#define ARC_CHANIDX_BITS (32 - ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF)
/* How many arcs can we have for a single channel?
* linearization parts, both directions, and dual */
#define ARCS_PER_CHANNEL ((size_t)1 << (PARTS_BITS + 1 + 1))
static inline void arc_to_parts(struct arc arc,
u32 *chanidx,
int *chandir,
u32 *part,
bool *dual)
{
if (chanidx)
*chanidx = (arc.idx >> ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF);
if (chandir)
*chandir = (arc.idx >> ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF) & 1;
if (part)
*part = (arc.idx >> ARC_PART_BITOFF) & ((1 << PARTS_BITS)-1);
if (dual)
*dual = (arc.idx >> ARC_DUAL_BITOFF) & 1;
}
static inline struct arc arc_from_parts(u32 chanidx, int chandir, u32 part, bool dual)
{
struct arc arc;
assert(part < CHANNEL_PARTS);
assert(chandir == 0 || chandir == 1);
assert(chanidx < (1U << ARC_CHANIDX_BITS));
arc.idx = ((u32)dual << ARC_DUAL_BITOFF)
| (part << ARC_PART_BITOFF)
| ((u32)chandir << ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF)
| (chanidx << ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF);
return arc;
}
#define MAX(x, y) (((x) > (y)) ? (x) : (y))
#define MIN(x, y) (((x) < (y)) ? (x) : (y))
struct pay_parameters {
const struct route_query *rq;
const struct gossmap_node *source;
const struct gossmap_node *target;
// how much we pay
struct amount_msat amount;
/* base unit for computation, ie. accuracy */
struct amount_msat accuracy;
// channel linearization parameters
double cap_fraction[CHANNEL_PARTS],
cost_fraction[CHANNEL_PARTS];
double delay_feefactor;
double base_fee_penalty;
};
/* Helper function.
* Given an arc of the network (not residual) give me the flow. */
static s64 get_arc_flow(
const s64 *arc_residual_capacity,
const struct graph *graph,
const struct arc arc)
{
assert(!arc_is_dual(graph, arc));
struct arc dual = arc_dual(graph, arc);
assert(dual.idx < tal_count(arc_residual_capacity));
return arc_residual_capacity[dual.idx];
}
/* Set *capacity to value, up to *cap_on_capacity. Reduce cap_on_capacity */
static void set_capacity(s64 *capacity, u64 value, u64 *cap_on_capacity)
{
*capacity = MIN(value, *cap_on_capacity);
*cap_on_capacity -= *capacity;
}
/* Helper to check whether a channel is available */
static bool channel_is_available(const struct route_query *rq,
const struct gossmap_chan *chan, const int dir)
{
const u32 c_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(rq->gossmap, chan);
return gossmap_chan_set(chan, dir) && chan->half[dir].enabled &&
!bitmap_test_bit(rq->disabled_chans, c_idx * 2 + dir);
}
/* FIXME: unit test this */
/* The probability of forwarding a payment amount given a high and low liquidity
* bounds.
* @low: the liquidity is known to be greater or equal than "low"
* @high: the liquidity is known to be less than "high"
* @amount: how much is required to forward */
static double pickhardt_richter_probability(struct amount_msat low,
struct amount_msat high,
struct amount_msat amount)
{
struct amount_msat all_states, good_states;
if (amount_msat_greater_eq(amount, high))
return 0.0;
if (!amount_msat_deduct(&amount, low))
return 1.0;
if (!amount_msat_sub(&all_states, high, low))
abort(); // we expect high > low
if (!amount_msat_sub(&good_states, all_states, amount))
abort(); // we expect high > amount
return amount_msat_ratio(good_states, all_states);
}
// TODO(eduardo): unit test this
/* Split a directed channel into parts with linear cost function. */
static void linearize_channel(const struct pay_parameters *params,
const struct gossmap_chan *c, const int dir,
s64 *capacity, double *cost)
{
struct amount_msat mincap, maxcap;
/* This takes into account any payments in progress. */
get_constraints(params->rq, c, dir, &mincap, &maxcap);
/* Assume if min > max, min is wrong */
if (amount_msat_greater(mincap, maxcap))
mincap = maxcap;
u64 a = amount_msat_ratio_floor(mincap, params->accuracy),
b = 1 + amount_msat_ratio_floor(maxcap, params->accuracy);
/* An extra bound on capacity, here we use it to reduce the flow such
* that it does not exceed htlcmax.
* The cap con capacity is not greater than the amount of payment units
* (msat/accuracy). The way a channel is decomposed into linear cost
* arcs (code below) in ascending cost order ensures that the only the
* necessary capacity to forward the payment is allocated in the lower
* cost arcs. This may lead to some arcs in the decomposition (at the
* high cost end) to have a capacity of 0, and we can prune them while
* keeping the solution optimal. */
u64 cap_on_capacity =
MIN(amount_msat_ratio_floor(gossmap_chan_htlc_max(c, dir),
params->accuracy),
amount_msat_ratio_ceil(params->amount, params->accuracy));
set_capacity(&capacity[0], a, &cap_on_capacity);
cost[0]=0;
for(size_t i=1;i<CHANNEL_PARTS;++i)
{
set_capacity(&capacity[i], params->cap_fraction[i]*(b-a), &cap_on_capacity);
cost[i] = params->cost_fraction[i] * 1000
* amount_msat_ratio(params->amount, params->accuracy)
/ (b - a);
}
}
static int cmp_u64(const u64 *a, const u64 *b, void *unused)
{
if (*a < *b)
return -1;
if (*a > *b)
return 1;
return 0;
}
static int cmp_double(const double *a, const double *b, void *unused)
{
if (*a < *b)
return -1;
if (*a > *b)
return 1;
return 0;
}
static double get_median_ratio(const tal_t *working_ctx,
const struct graph *graph,
const double *arc_prob_cost,
const s64 *arc_fee_cost)
{
const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph);
u64 *u64_arr = tal_arr(working_ctx, u64, max_num_arcs);
double *double_arr = tal_arr(working_ctx, double, max_num_arcs);
size_t n = 0;
for (struct arc arc = {.idx=0};arc.idx < max_num_arcs; ++arc.idx) {
/* scan real arcs, not unused id slots or dual arcs */
if (arc_is_dual(graph, arc) || !arc_enabled(graph, arc))
continue;
assert(n < max_num_arcs/2);
u64_arr[n] = arc_fee_cost[arc.idx];
double_arr[n] = arc_prob_cost[arc.idx];
n++;
}
asort(u64_arr, n, cmp_u64, NULL);
asort(double_arr, n, cmp_double, NULL);
/* Empty network, or tiny probability, nobody cares */
if (n == 0 || double_arr[n/2] < 0.001)
return 1;
/* You need to scale arc_prob_cost by this to match arc_fee_cost */
return u64_arr[n/2] / double_arr[n/2];
}
static void combine_cost_function(const tal_t *working_ctx,
const struct graph *graph,
const double *arc_prob_cost,
const s64 *arc_fee_cost, const s8 *biases,
s64 mu, s64 *arc_cost)
{
/* probabilty and fee costs are not directly comparable!
* Scale by ratio of (positive) medians. */
const double k =
get_median_ratio(working_ctx, graph, arc_prob_cost, arc_fee_cost);
const double ln_30 = log(30);
const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph);
for(struct arc arc = {.idx=0};arc.idx < max_num_arcs; ++arc.idx)
{
if (arc_is_dual(graph, arc) || !arc_enabled(graph, arc))
continue;
const double pcost = arc_prob_cost[arc.idx];
const s64 fcost = arc_fee_cost[arc.idx];
double combined;
u32 chanidx;
int chandir;
s32 bias;
assert(fcost != INFINITE);
assert(pcost != DBL_MAX);
combined = fcost*mu + (MU_MAX-mu)*pcost*k;
/* Bias is in human scale, where "bigger is better" */
arc_to_parts(arc, &chanidx, &chandir, NULL, NULL);
bias = biases[(chanidx << 1) | chandir];
if (bias != 0) {
/* After some trial and error, this gives a nice
* dynamic range (25 seems to be "infinite" in
* practice):
* e^(-bias / (100/ln(30)))
*/
double bias_factor = exp(-bias / (100 / ln_30));
arc_cost[arc.idx] = combined * bias_factor;
} else {
arc_cost[arc.idx] = combined;
}
/* and the respective dual */
struct arc dual = arc_dual(graph, arc);
arc_cost[dual.idx] = -combined;
}
}
/* Get the fee cost associated to this directed channel.
* Cost is expressed as PPM of the payment.
*
* Choose and integer `c_fee` to linearize the following fee function
*
* fee_msat = base_msat + floor(millionths*x_msat / 10^6)
*
* into
*
* fee = c_fee/10^6 * x
*
* use `base_fee_penalty` to weight the base fee and `delay_feefactor` to
* weight the CLTV delay.
* */
static s64 linear_fee_cost(u32 base_fee, u32 proportional_fee, u16 cltv_delta,
double base_fee_penalty,
double delay_feefactor)
{
s64 pfee = proportional_fee,
bfee = base_fee,
delay = cltv_delta;
return pfee + bfee* base_fee_penalty+ delay*delay_feefactor;
}
/* This is inversely proportional to the amount we expect to send. Let's
* assume we will send ~10th of the total amount per path. But note
* that it converts to parts per million! */
static double base_fee_penalty_estimate(struct amount_msat amount)
{
return amount_msat_ratio(AMOUNT_MSAT(10000000), amount);
}
static void init_linear_network(const tal_t *ctx,
const struct pay_parameters *params,
struct graph **graph, double **arc_prob_cost,
s64 **arc_fee_cost, s64 **arc_capacity)
{
const struct gossmap *gossmap = params->rq->gossmap;
const size_t max_num_chans = gossmap_max_chan_idx(gossmap);
const size_t max_num_arcs = max_num_chans * ARCS_PER_CHANNEL;
const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(gossmap);
*graph = graph_new(ctx, max_num_nodes, max_num_arcs, ARC_DUAL_BITOFF);
*arc_prob_cost = tal_arr(ctx, double, max_num_arcs);
for (size_t i = 0; i < max_num_arcs; ++i)
(*arc_prob_cost)[i] = DBL_MAX;
*arc_fee_cost = tal_arr(ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
for (size_t i = 0; i < max_num_arcs; ++i)
(*arc_fee_cost)[i] = INT64_MAX;
*arc_capacity = tal_arrz(ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
for(struct gossmap_node *node = gossmap_first_node(gossmap);
node;
node=gossmap_next_node(gossmap,node))
{
const u32 node_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap,node);
for(size_t j=0;j<node->num_chans;++j)
{
int half;
const struct gossmap_chan *c = gossmap_nth_chan(gossmap,
node, j, &half);
if (!channel_is_available(params->rq, c, half))
continue;
/* If a channel insists on more than our total, remove it */
if (amount_msat_less(params->amount, gossmap_chan_htlc_min(c, half)))
continue;
const u32 chan_id = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, c);
const struct gossmap_node *next = gossmap_nth_node(gossmap,
c,!half);
const u32 next_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap,next);
if(node_id==next_id)
continue;
// `cost` is the word normally used to denote cost per
// unit of flow in the context of MCF.
double prob_cost[CHANNEL_PARTS];
s64 capacity[CHANNEL_PARTS];
// split this channel direction to obtain the arcs
// that are outgoing to `node`
linearize_channel(params, c, half, capacity, prob_cost);
/* linear fee_cost per unit of flow */
const s64 fee_cost = linear_fee_cost(
c->half[half].base_fee,
c->half[half].proportional_fee,
c->half[half].delay,
params->base_fee_penalty,
params->delay_feefactor);
// let's subscribe the 4 parts of the channel direction
// (c,half), the dual of these guys will be subscribed
// when the `i` hits the `next` node.
for(size_t k=0;k<CHANNEL_PARTS;++k)
{
/* prune arcs with 0 capacity */
if (capacity[k] == 0)
continue;
struct arc arc = arc_from_parts(chan_id, half, k, false);
graph_add_arc(*graph, arc,
node_obj(node_id),
node_obj(next_id));
(*arc_capacity)[arc.idx] = capacity[k];
(*arc_prob_cost)[arc.idx] = prob_cost[k];
(*arc_fee_cost)[arc.idx] = fee_cost;
// + the respective dual
struct arc dual = arc_dual(*graph, arc);
(*arc_capacity)[dual.idx] = 0;
(*arc_prob_cost)[dual.idx] = -prob_cost[k];
(*arc_fee_cost)[dual.idx] = -fee_cost;
}
}
}
}
// flow on directed channels
struct chan_flow
{
s64 half[2];
};
/* Search in the network a path of positive flow until we reach a node with
* positive balance (returns a node idx with positive balance)
* or we discover a cycle (returns a node idx with 0 balance).
* */
static struct node find_path_or_cycle(
const tal_t *working_ctx,
const struct route_query *rq,
const struct chan_flow *chan_flow,
const struct node source,
const s64 *balance,
const struct gossmap_chan **prev_chan,
int *prev_dir,
u32 *prev_idx)
{
const struct gossmap *gossmap = rq->gossmap;
const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(gossmap);
bitmap *visited =
tal_arrz(working_ctx, bitmap, BITMAP_NWORDS(max_num_nodes));
u32 final_idx = source.idx;
bitmap_set_bit(visited, final_idx);
/* It is guaranteed to halt, because we either find a node with
* balance[]>0 or we hit a node twice and we stop. */
while (balance[final_idx] <= 0) {
u32 updated_idx = INVALID_INDEX;
struct gossmap_node *cur =
gossmap_node_byidx(gossmap, final_idx);
for (size_t i = 0; i < cur->num_chans; ++i) {
int dir;
const struct gossmap_chan *c =
gossmap_nth_chan(gossmap, cur, i, &dir);
if (!channel_is_available(rq, c, dir))
continue;
const u32 c_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, c);
/* follow the flow */
if (chan_flow[c_idx].half[dir] > 0) {
const struct gossmap_node *n =
gossmap_nth_node(gossmap, c, !dir);
u32 next_idx = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap, n);
prev_dir[next_idx] = dir;
prev_chan[next_idx] = c;
prev_idx[next_idx] = final_idx;
updated_idx = next_idx;
break;
}
}
assert(updated_idx != INVALID_INDEX);
assert(updated_idx != final_idx);
final_idx = updated_idx;
if (bitmap_test_bit(visited, updated_idx)) {
/* We have seen this node before, we've found a cycle.
*/
assert(balance[updated_idx] <= 0);
break;
}
bitmap_set_bit(visited, updated_idx);
}
return node_obj(final_idx);
}
struct list_data
{
struct list_node list;
struct flow *flow_path;
};
/* Given a path from a node with negative balance to a node with positive
* balance, compute the bigest flow and substract it from the nodes balance and
* the channels allocation. */
static struct flow *substract_flow(const tal_t *ctx,
const struct pay_parameters *params,
const struct node source,
const struct node sink,
s64 *balance, struct chan_flow *chan_flow,
const u32 *prev_idx, const int *prev_dir,
const struct gossmap_chan *const *prev_chan)
{
const struct gossmap *gossmap = params->rq->gossmap;
assert(balance[source.idx] < 0);
assert(balance[sink.idx] > 0);
s64 delta = -balance[source.idx];
size_t length = 0;
delta = MIN(delta, balance[sink.idx]);
/* We can only walk backwards, now get me the legth of the path and the
* max flow we can send through this route. */
for (u32 cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx != source.idx;
cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]) {
assert(cur_idx != INVALID_INDEX);
const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx];
const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx];
/* we could optimize here by caching the idx of the channels in
* the path, but the bottleneck of the algorithm is the MCF
* computation not here. */
const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan);
delta = MIN(delta, chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir]);
length++;
}
struct flow *f = tal(ctx, struct flow);
f->path = tal_arr(f, const struct gossmap_chan *, length);
f->dirs = tal_arr(f, int, length);
/* Walk again and substract the flow value (delta). */
assert(delta > 0);
balance[source.idx] += delta;
balance[sink.idx] -= delta;
for (u32 cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx != source.idx;
cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]) {
const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx];
const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx];
const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan);
length--;
/* f->path and f->dirs contain the channels in the path in the
* correct order. */
f->path[length] = chan;
f->dirs[length] = dir;
chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir] -= delta;
}
if (!amount_msat_mul(&f->delivers, params->accuracy, delta))
abort();
return f;
}
/* Substract a flow cycle from the channel allocation. */
static void substract_cycle(const struct gossmap *gossmap,
const struct node sink,
struct chan_flow *chan_flow, const u32 *prev_idx,
const int *prev_dir,
const struct gossmap_chan *const *prev_chan)
{
s64 delta = INFINITE;
u32 cur_idx;
/* Compute greatest flow in this cycle. */
for (cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx!=INVALID_INDEX;) {
const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx];
const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx];
const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan);
delta = MIN(delta, chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir]);
cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx];
if (cur_idx == sink.idx)
/* we have come back full circle */
break;
}
assert(cur_idx==sink.idx);
/* Walk again and substract the flow value (delta). */
assert(delta < INFINITE);
assert(delta > 0);
for (cur_idx = sink.idx;cur_idx!=INVALID_INDEX;) {
const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx];
const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx];
const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan);
chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir] -= delta;
cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx];
if (cur_idx == sink.idx)
/* we have come back full circle */
break;
}
assert(cur_idx==sink.idx);
}
/* Given a flow in the residual network, build a set of payment flows in the
* gossmap that corresponds to this flow. */
static struct flow **
get_flow_paths(const tal_t *ctx,
const tal_t *working_ctx,
const struct pay_parameters *params,
const struct graph *graph,
const s64 *arc_residual_capacity)
{
struct flow **flows = tal_arr(ctx,struct flow*,0);
const size_t max_num_chans = gossmap_max_chan_idx(params->rq->gossmap);
struct chan_flow *chan_flow = tal_arrz(working_ctx,struct chan_flow,max_num_chans);
const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(params->rq->gossmap);
s64 *balance = tal_arrz(working_ctx,s64,max_num_nodes);
const struct gossmap_chan **prev_chan
= tal_arr(working_ctx,const struct gossmap_chan *,max_num_nodes);
int *prev_dir = tal_arr(working_ctx,int,max_num_nodes);
u32 *prev_idx = tal_arr(working_ctx, u32, max_num_nodes);
for (u32 node_idx = 0; node_idx < max_num_nodes; node_idx++)
prev_idx[node_idx] = INVALID_INDEX;
// Convert the arc based residual network flow into a flow in the
// directed channel network.
// Compute balance on the nodes.
for (struct node n = {.idx = 0}; n.idx < max_num_nodes; n.idx++) {
for(struct arc arc = node_adjacency_begin(graph,n);
!node_adjacency_end(arc);
arc = node_adjacency_next(graph,arc))
{
if(arc_is_dual(graph, arc))
continue;
struct node m = arc_head(graph,arc);
s64 flow = get_arc_flow(arc_residual_capacity,
graph, arc);
u32 chanidx;
int chandir;
balance[n.idx] -= flow;
balance[m.idx] += flow;
arc_to_parts(arc, &chanidx, &chandir, NULL, NULL);
chan_flow[chanidx].half[chandir] +=flow;
}
}
// Select all nodes with negative balance and find a flow that reaches a
// positive balance node.
for (struct node source = {.idx = 0}; source.idx < max_num_nodes;
source.idx++) {
// this node has negative balance, flows leaves from here
while (balance[source.idx] < 0) {
prev_chan[source.idx] = NULL;
struct node sink = find_path_or_cycle(
working_ctx, params->rq, chan_flow, source,
balance, prev_chan, prev_dir, prev_idx);
if (balance[sink.idx] > 0)
/* case 1. found a path */
{
struct flow *fp = substract_flow(
flows, params, source, sink, balance,
chan_flow, prev_idx, prev_dir, prev_chan);
tal_arr_expand(&flows, fp);
} else
/* case 2. found a cycle */
{
substract_cycle(params->rq->gossmap, sink, chan_flow,
prev_idx, prev_dir, prev_chan);
}
}
}
return flows;
}
/* Given a single path build a flow set. */
static struct flow **
get_flow_singlepath(const tal_t *ctx, const struct pay_parameters *params,
const struct graph *graph, const struct gossmap *gossmap,
const struct node source, const struct node destination,
const u64 pay_amount, const struct arc *prev)
{
struct flow **flows, *f;
flows = tal_arr(ctx, struct flow *, 1);
f = flows[0] = tal(flows, struct flow);
size_t length = 0;
for (u32 cur_idx = destination.idx; cur_idx != source.idx;) {
assert(cur_idx != INVALID_INDEX);
length++;
struct arc arc = prev[cur_idx];
struct node next = arc_tail(graph, arc);
cur_idx = next.idx;
}
f->path = tal_arr(f, const struct gossmap_chan *, length);
f->dirs = tal_arr(f, int, length);
for (u32 cur_idx = destination.idx; cur_idx != source.idx;) {
int chandir;
u32 chanidx;
struct arc arc = prev[cur_idx];
arc_to_parts(arc, &chanidx, &chandir, NULL, NULL);
length--;
f->path[length] = gossmap_chan_byidx(gossmap, chanidx);
f->dirs[length] = chandir;
struct node next = arc_tail(graph, arc);
cur_idx = next.idx;
}
f->delivers = params->amount;
return flows;
}
// TODO(eduardo): choose some default values for the minflow parameters
/* eduardo: I think it should be clear that this module deals with linear
* flows, ie. base fees are not considered. Hence a flow along a path is
* described with a sequence of directed channels and one amount.
* In the `pay_flow` module there are dedicated routes to compute the actual
* amount to be forward on each hop.
*
* TODO(eduardo): notice that we don't pay fees to forward payments with local
* channels and we can tell with absolute certainty the liquidity on them.
* Check that local channels have fee costs = 0 and bounds with certainty (min=max). */
// TODO(eduardo): we should LOG_DBG the process of finding the MCF while
// adjusting the frugality factor.
static struct flow **minflow(const tal_t *ctx,
const struct route_query *rq,
const struct gossmap_node *source,
const struct gossmap_node *target,
struct amount_msat amount,
u32 mu,
double delay_feefactor)
{
struct flow **flow_paths;
/* We allocate everything off this, and free it at the end,
* as we can be called multiple times without cleaning tmpctx! */
tal_t *working_ctx = tal(NULL, char);
struct pay_parameters *params = tal(working_ctx, struct pay_parameters);
params->rq = rq;
params->source = source;
params->target = target;
params->amount = amount;
/* -> We reduce the granularity of the flow by limiting the subdivision
* of the payment amount into 1000 units of flow. That reduces the
* computational burden for algorithms that depend on it, eg. "capacity
* scaling" and "successive shortest path".
* -> Using Ceil operation instead of Floor so that
* accuracy x 1000 >= amount
* */
params->accuracy =
amount_msat_max(AMOUNT_MSAT(1), amount_msat_div_ceil(amount, 1000));
// template the channel partition into linear arcs
params->cap_fraction[0]=0;
params->cost_fraction[0]=0;
for(size_t i =1;i<CHANNEL_PARTS;++i)
{
params->cap_fraction[i]=CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i]-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i-1];
params->cost_fraction[i]=
log((1-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i-1])/(1-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i]))
/params->cap_fraction[i];
}
params->delay_feefactor = delay_feefactor;
params->base_fee_penalty = base_fee_penalty_estimate(amount);
// build the uncertainty network with linearization and residual arcs
struct graph *graph;
double *arc_prob_cost;
s64 *arc_fee_cost;
s64 *arc_capacity;
init_linear_network(working_ctx, params, &graph, &arc_prob_cost,
&arc_fee_cost, &arc_capacity);
const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph);
const size_t max_num_nodes = graph_max_num_nodes(graph);
s64 *arc_cost;
s64 *node_potential;
s64 *node_excess;
arc_cost = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
node_potential = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_nodes);
node_excess = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_nodes);
const struct node dst = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, target)};
const struct node src = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, source)};
/* Since we have constraint accuracy, ask to find a payment solution
* that can pay a bit more than the actual value rathen than undershoot it.
* That's why we use the ceil function here. */
const u64 pay_amount =
amount_msat_ratio_ceil(params->amount, params->accuracy);
if (!simple_feasibleflow(working_ctx, graph, src, dst,
arc_capacity, pay_amount)) {
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_INFORM,
"%s failed: unable to find a feasible flow.", __func__);
goto fail;
}
combine_cost_function(working_ctx, graph, arc_prob_cost, arc_fee_cost,
rq->biases, mu, arc_cost);
/* We solve a linear MCF problem. */
if (!mcf_refinement(working_ctx,
graph,
node_excess,
arc_capacity,
arc_cost,
node_potential)) {
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: MCF optimization step failed", __func__);
goto fail;
}
/* We dissect the solution of the MCF into payment routes.
* Actual amounts considering fees are computed for every
* channel in the routes. */
flow_paths = get_flow_paths(ctx, working_ctx, params,
graph, arc_capacity);
if (!flow_paths) {
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: failed to extract flow paths from the MCF solution",
__func__);
goto fail;
}
tal_free(working_ctx);
return flow_paths;
fail:
tal_free(working_ctx);
return NULL;
}
/* Initialize the data vectors for the single-path solver. */
static void init_linear_network_single_path(
const tal_t *ctx, const struct pay_parameters *params, struct graph **graph,
double **arc_prob_cost, s64 **arc_fee_cost, s64 **arc_capacity)
{
const size_t max_num_chans = gossmap_max_chan_idx(params->rq->gossmap);
const size_t max_num_arcs = max_num_chans * ARCS_PER_CHANNEL;
const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(params->rq->gossmap);
*graph = graph_new(ctx, max_num_nodes, max_num_arcs, ARC_DUAL_BITOFF);
*arc_prob_cost = tal_arr(ctx, double, max_num_arcs);
for (size_t i = 0; i < max_num_arcs; ++i)
(*arc_prob_cost)[i] = DBL_MAX;
*arc_fee_cost = tal_arr(ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
for (size_t i = 0; i < max_num_arcs; ++i)
(*arc_fee_cost)[i] = INT64_MAX;
*arc_capacity = tal_arrz(ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
const struct gossmap *gossmap = params->rq->gossmap;
for (struct gossmap_node *node = gossmap_first_node(gossmap); node;
node = gossmap_next_node(gossmap, node)) {
const u32 node_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap, node);
for (size_t j = 0; j < node->num_chans; ++j) {
int half;
const struct gossmap_chan *c =
gossmap_nth_chan(gossmap, node, j, &half);
struct amount_msat mincap, maxcap;
if (!channel_is_available(params->rq, c, half))
continue;
/* If a channel cannot forward the total amount we don't
* use it. */
if (amount_msat_less(params->amount,
gossmap_chan_htlc_min(c, half)) ||
amount_msat_greater(params->amount,
gossmap_chan_htlc_max(c, half)))
continue;
get_constraints(params->rq, c, half, &mincap, &maxcap);
/* Assume if min > max, min is wrong */
if (amount_msat_greater(mincap, maxcap))
mincap = maxcap;
/* It is preferable to work on 1msat past the known
* bound. */
if (!amount_msat_accumulate(&maxcap, amount_msat(1)))
abort();
/* If amount is greater than the known liquidity upper
* bound we get infinite probability cost. */
if (amount_msat_greater_eq(params->amount, maxcap))
continue;
const u32 chan_id = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, c);
const struct gossmap_node *next =
gossmap_nth_node(gossmap, c, !half);
const u32 next_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap, next);
/* channel to self? */
if (node_id == next_id)
continue;
struct arc arc =
arc_from_parts(chan_id, half, 0, false);
graph_add_arc(*graph, arc, node_obj(node_id),
node_obj(next_id));
(*arc_capacity)[arc.idx] = 1;
(*arc_prob_cost)[arc.idx] =
(-1.0) * log(pickhardt_richter_probability(
mincap, maxcap, params->amount));
struct amount_msat fee;
if (!amount_msat_fee(&fee, params->amount,
c->half[half].base_fee,
c->half[half].proportional_fee))
abort();
(*arc_fee_cost)[arc.idx] =
fee.millisatoshis + /* Raw: fee cost */
params->delay_feefactor * c->half[half].delay;
}
}
}
/**
* API for min cost single path.
* @ctx: context to allocate returned flows from
* @rq: the route_query we're processing (for logging)
* @source: the source to start from
* @target: the target to pay
* @amount: the amount we want to reach @target
* @mu: 0 = corresponds to only probabilities, 100 corresponds to only fee.
* @delay_feefactor: convert 1 block delay into msat.
*
* @delay_feefactor converts 1 block delay into msat, as if it were an additional
* fee. So if a CLTV delay on a node is 5 blocks, that's treated as if it
* were a fee of 5 * @delay_feefactor.
*
* Returns an array with one flow which deliver amount to target, or NULL.
*/
static struct flow **single_path_flow(const tal_t *ctx, const struct route_query *rq,
const struct gossmap_node *source,
const struct gossmap_node *target,
struct amount_msat amount, u32 mu,
double delay_feefactor)
{
struct flow **flow_paths;
/* We allocate everything off this, and free it at the end,
* as we can be called multiple times without cleaning tmpctx! */
tal_t *working_ctx = tal(NULL, char);
struct pay_parameters *params = tal(working_ctx, struct pay_parameters);
params->rq = rq;
params->source = source;
params->target = target;
params->amount = amount;
/* for the single-path solver the accuracy does not detriment
* performance */
params->accuracy = amount;
params->delay_feefactor = delay_feefactor;
params->base_fee_penalty = base_fee_penalty_estimate(amount);
struct graph *graph;
double *arc_prob_cost;
s64 *arc_fee_cost;
s64 *arc_capacity;
init_linear_network_single_path(working_ctx, params, &graph,
&arc_prob_cost, &arc_fee_cost,
&arc_capacity);
const struct node dst = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, target)};
const struct node src = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, source)};
const size_t max_num_nodes = graph_max_num_nodes(graph);
const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph);
s64 *potential = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_nodes);
s64 *distance = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_nodes);
s64 *arc_cost = tal_arrz(working_ctx, s64, max_num_arcs);
struct arc *prev = tal_arrz(working_ctx, struct arc, max_num_nodes);
combine_cost_function(working_ctx, graph, arc_prob_cost, arc_fee_cost,
rq->biases, mu, arc_cost);
/* We solve a linear cost flow problem. */
if (!dijkstra_path(working_ctx, graph, src, dst,
/* prune = */ true, arc_capacity,
/*threshold = */ 1, arc_cost, potential, prev,
distance)) {
/* This might fail if we are unable to find a suitable route, it
* doesn't mean the plugin is broken, that's why we LOG_INFORM. */
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_INFORM,
"%s: could not find a feasible single path", __func__);
goto fail;
}
const u64 pay_amount =
amount_msat_ratio_ceil(params->amount, params->accuracy);
/* We dissect the flow into payment routes.
* Actual amounts considering fees are computed for every
* channel in the routes. */
flow_paths = get_flow_singlepath(ctx, params, graph, rq->gossmap,
src, dst, pay_amount, prev);
if (!flow_paths) {
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: failed to extract flow paths from the single-path "
"solution",
__func__);
goto fail;
}
if (tal_count(flow_paths) != 1) {
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: single-path solution returned a multi route solution",
__func__);
goto fail;
}
tal_free(working_ctx);
return flow_paths;
fail:
tal_free(working_ctx);
return NULL;
}
/* Get the scidd for the i'th hop in flow */
static void get_scidd(const struct gossmap *gossmap, const struct flow *flow,
size_t i, struct short_channel_id_dir *scidd)
{
scidd->scid = gossmap_chan_scid(gossmap, flow->path[i]);
scidd->dir = flow->dirs[i];
}
/* We use an fp16_t approximatin for htlc_max/min: this gets the exact value. */
static struct amount_msat
get_chan_htlc_max(const struct route_query *rq, const struct gossmap_chan *c,
const struct short_channel_id_dir *scidd)
{
struct amount_msat htlc_max;
gossmap_chan_get_update_details(rq->gossmap, c, scidd->dir, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
&htlc_max);
return htlc_max;
}
static struct amount_msat
get_chan_htlc_min(const struct route_query *rq, const struct gossmap_chan *c,
const struct short_channel_id_dir *scidd)
{
struct amount_msat htlc_min;
gossmap_chan_get_update_details(rq->gossmap, c, scidd->dir, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, &htlc_min,
NULL);
return htlc_min;
}
static bool check_htlc_min_limits(struct route_query *rq, struct flow **flows)
{
for (size_t k = 0; k < tal_count(flows); k++) {
struct flow *flow = flows[k];
size_t pathlen = tal_count(flow->path);
struct amount_msat hop_amt = flow->delivers;
for (size_t i = pathlen - 1; i < pathlen; i--) {
const struct half_chan *h = flow_edge(flow, i);
struct short_channel_id_dir scidd;
get_scidd(rq->gossmap, flow, i, &scidd);
struct amount_msat htlc_min =
get_chan_htlc_min(rq, flow->path[i], &scidd);
if (amount_msat_less(hop_amt, htlc_min))
return false;
if (!amount_msat_add_fee(&hop_amt, h->base_fee,
h->proportional_fee))
abort();
}
}
return true;
}
static bool check_htlc_max_limits(struct route_query *rq, struct flow **flows)
{
for (size_t k = 0; k < tal_count(flows); k++) {
struct flow *flow = flows[k];
size_t pathlen = tal_count(flow->path);
struct amount_msat hop_amt = flow->delivers;
for (size_t i = pathlen - 1; i < pathlen; i--) {
const struct half_chan *h = flow_edge(flow, i);
struct short_channel_id_dir scidd;
get_scidd(rq->gossmap, flow, i, &scidd);
struct amount_msat htlc_max =
get_chan_htlc_max(rq, flow->path[i], &scidd);
if (amount_msat_greater(hop_amt, htlc_max))
return false;
if (!amount_msat_add_fee(&hop_amt, h->base_fee,
h->proportional_fee))
abort();
}
}
return true;
}
/* FIXME: add extra constraint maximum route length, use an activation
* probability cost for each channel. Recall that every activation cost, eg.
* base fee and activation probability can only be properly added modifying the
* graph topology by creating an activation node for every half channel. */
/* FIXME: add extra constraint maximum number of routes, fixes issue 8331. */
/* FIXME: add a boolean option to make recipient pay for fees, fixes issue 8353.
*/
static const char *
linear_routes(const tal_t *ctx, struct route_query *rq,
struct timemono deadline,
const struct gossmap_node *srcnode,
const struct gossmap_node *dstnode, struct amount_msat amount,
struct amount_msat maxfee, u32 finalcltv, u32 maxdelay,
size_t maxparts,
struct flow ***flows, double *probability,
struct flow **(*solver)(const tal_t *, const struct route_query *,
const struct gossmap_node *,
const struct gossmap_node *,
struct amount_msat, u32, double))
{
const tal_t *working_ctx = tal(ctx, tal_t);
const char *error_message;
struct amount_msat amount_to_deliver = amount;
struct amount_msat feebudget = maxfee;
/* FIXME: mu is an integer from 0 to MU_MAX that we use to combine fees
* and probability costs, but I think we can make it a real number from
* 0 to 1. */
u32 mu = 1;
/* we start at 1e-6 and increase it exponentially (x2) up to 10. */
double delay_feefactor = 1e-6;
struct flow **new_flows = NULL;
struct amount_msat all_deliver;
*flows = tal_arr(working_ctx, struct flow *, 0);
/* Re-use the reservation system to make flows aware of each other. */
struct reserve_hop *reservations = new_reservations(working_ctx, rq);
while (!amount_msat_is_zero(amount_to_deliver)) {
if (timemono_after(time_mono(), deadline)) {
error_message = child_log(ctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: timed out after deadline",
__func__);
goto fail;
}
new_flows = tal_free(new_flows);
/* If the amount_to_deliver is very small we better use a single
* path computation because:
* 1. we save cpu cycles
* 2. we have better control over htlc_min violations.
* We need to make the distinction here because after
* refine_with_fees_and_limits we might have a set of flows that
* do not deliver the entire payment amount by just a small
* amount. */
if (amount_msat_less_eq(amount_to_deliver,
SINGLE_PATH_THRESHOLD)) {
new_flows = single_path_flow(working_ctx, rq, srcnode,
dstnode, amount_to_deliver,
mu, delay_feefactor);
} else {
new_flows =
solver(working_ctx, rq, srcnode, dstnode,
amount_to_deliver, mu, delay_feefactor);
}
if (!new_flows) {
error_message = explain_failure(
ctx, rq, srcnode, dstnode, amount_to_deliver);
goto fail;
}
error_message =
refine_flows(ctx, rq, amount_to_deliver, &new_flows);
if (error_message)
goto fail;
/* we finished removing flows and excess */
all_deliver = flowset_delivers(new_flows);
if (amount_msat_is_zero(all_deliver)) {
/* We removed all flows and we have not modified the
* MCF parameters. We will not have an infinite loop
* here because at least we have disabled some channels.
*/
continue;
}
/* We might want to overpay sometimes, eg. shadow routing, but
* right now if all_deliver > amount_to_deliver means a bug. */
assert(amount_msat_greater_eq(amount_to_deliver, all_deliver));
/* no flows should send 0 amount */
for (size_t i = 0; i < tal_count(new_flows); i++) {
// FIXME: replace all assertions with LOG_BROKEN
assert(!amount_msat_is_zero(new_flows[i]->delivers));
}
/* Is this set of flows too expensive?
* We can check if the new flows are within the fee budget,
* however in some cases we have discarded some flows at this
* point and the new flows do not deliver all the value we need
* so that a further solver iteration is needed. Hence we
* check if the fees paid by these new flows are below the
* feebudget proportionally adjusted by the amount this set of
* flows deliver with respect to the total remaining amount,
* ie. we avoid "consuming" all the feebudget if we still need
* to run MCF again for some remaining amount. */
struct amount_msat all_fees = flowset_fee(new_flows);
const double deliver_fraction =
amount_msat_ratio(all_deliver, amount_to_deliver);
struct amount_msat partial_feebudget;
if (!amount_msat_scale(&partial_feebudget, feebudget,
deliver_fraction)) {
error_message =
child_log(ctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: failed to scale the fee budget (%s) by "
"fraction (%lf)",
__func__, fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, feebudget),
deliver_fraction);
goto fail;
}
if (amount_msat_greater(all_fees, partial_feebudget)) {
if (mu < MU_MAX) {
/* all_fees exceed the strong budget limit, try
* to fix it increasing mu. */
if (mu == 1)
mu = 10;
else
mu += 10;
mu = MIN(mu, MU_MAX);
child_log(
tmpctx, LOG_INFORM,
"The flows had a fee of %s, greater than "
"max of %s, retrying with mu of %u%%...",
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, all_fees),
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, partial_feebudget),
mu);
continue;
} else if (amount_msat_greater(all_fees, feebudget)) {
/* we cannot increase mu anymore and all_fees
* already exceeds feebudget we fail. */
error_message =
child_log(ctx, LOG_UNUSUAL,
"Could not find route without "
"excessive cost");
goto fail;
} else {
/* mu cannot be increased but at least all_fees
* does not exceed feebudget, we give it a shot.
*/
child_log(
tmpctx, LOG_UNUSUAL,
"The flows had a fee of %s, greater than "
"max of %s, but still within the fee "
"budget %s, we accept those flows.",
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, all_fees),
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, partial_feebudget),
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, feebudget));
}
}
/* Too much delay? */
if (finalcltv + flows_worst_delay(new_flows) > maxdelay) {
if (delay_feefactor > 10) {
error_message =
child_log(ctx, LOG_UNUSUAL,
"Could not find route without "
"excessive delays");
goto fail;
}
delay_feefactor *= 2;
child_log(tmpctx, LOG_INFORM,
"The worst flow delay is %" PRIu64
" (> %i), retrying with delay_feefactor %f...",
flows_worst_delay(new_flows), maxdelay - finalcltv,
delay_feefactor);
continue;
}
all_fees = AMOUNT_MSAT(0);
all_deliver = AMOUNT_MSAT(0);
/* add the new flows to the final solution */
for (size_t i = 0; i < tal_count(new_flows); i++) {
/* last check: every time we add a new reservation to a
* local channel we remove some amount to pay for fees
* on the additional HTLC. */
if (create_flow_reservations_verify(rq, &reservations,
new_flows[i])) {
tal_arr_expand(flows, new_flows[i]);
tal_steal(*flows, new_flows[i]);
if (!amount_msat_accumulate(
&all_deliver, new_flows[i]->delivers) ||
!amount_msat_accumulate(
&all_fees,
flow_fee(new_flows[i])))
abort();
}
}
if (!amount_msat_deduct(&feebudget, all_fees) ||
!amount_msat_deduct(&amount_to_deliver, all_deliver)) {
error_message =
child_log(ctx, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: unexpected arithmetic operation "
"failure on amount_msat",
__func__);
goto fail;
}
}
/* transfer ownership */
*flows = tal_steal(ctx, *flows);
/* cleanup */
tal_free(working_ctx);
/* all set! Now squash flows that use the same path */
squash_flows(ctx, rq, flows);
/* If we're over the number of parts, try to cram excess into the
* largest-capacity parts */
if (tal_count(*flows) > maxparts) {
struct amount_msat fee;
error_message = reduce_num_flows(rq, rq, flows, amount, maxparts);
if (error_message) {
*flows = tal_free(*flows);
return error_message;
}
/* Check fee budget! */
fee = flowset_fee(*flows);
if (amount_msat_greater(fee, maxfee)) {
error_message = child_log(rq, LOG_INFORM,
"After reducing the flows to %zu (i.e. maxparts),"
" we had a fee of %s, greater than "
"max of %s.",
tal_count(*flows),
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, fee),
fmt_amount_msat(tmpctx, maxfee));
*flows = tal_free(*flows);
return error_message;
}
}
/* flows_probability re-does a temporary reservation so we need to call
* it after we have cleaned the reservations we used to build the flows
* hence after we freed working_ctx. */
*probability = flows_probability(ctx, rq, flows);
/* we should have fixed all htlc violations, "don't trust,
* verify" */
if (!check_htlc_min_limits(rq, *flows)) {
error_message =
child_log(rq, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: check_htlc_min_limits failed", __func__);
*flows = tal_free(*flows);
return error_message;
}
if (!check_htlc_max_limits(rq, *flows)) {
*flows = tal_free(*flows);
return child_log(rq, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: check_htlc_max_limits failed", __func__);
}
if (tal_count(*flows) > maxparts) {
size_t num_flows = tal_count(*flows);
*flows = tal_free(*flows);
return child_log(rq, LOG_BROKEN,
"%s: the number of flows (%zu) exceeds the limit set "
"on payment parts (%zu), please submit a bug report",
__func__, num_flows, maxparts);
}
return NULL;
fail:
/* cleanup */
tal_free(working_ctx);
assert(error_message != NULL);
return error_message;
}
const char *default_routes(const tal_t *ctx, struct route_query *rq,
struct timemono deadline,
const struct gossmap_node *srcnode,
const struct gossmap_node *dstnode,
struct amount_msat amount, struct amount_msat maxfee,
u32 finalcltv, u32 maxdelay, size_t maxparts,
struct flow ***flows,
double *probability)
{
return linear_routes(ctx, rq, deadline, srcnode, dstnode, amount, maxfee,
finalcltv, maxdelay, maxparts, flows, probability, minflow);
}
const char *single_path_routes(const tal_t *ctx, struct route_query *rq,
struct timemono deadline,
const struct gossmap_node *srcnode,
const struct gossmap_node *dstnode,
struct amount_msat amount,
struct amount_msat maxfee, u32 finalcltv,
u32 maxdelay, struct flow ***flows,
double *probability)
{
return linear_routes(ctx, rq, deadline, srcnode, dstnode, amount, maxfee,
finalcltv, maxdelay, 1, flows, probability,
single_path_flow);
}