fixes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/7919
In the past, when creating payment requests, we keyed them by on-chain address,
and set/saved the msg of the request as label for the address.
Many places in the code were calling wallet.get_label(addr) with the expectation that
relevant payment requests are found and their message/description (if any) is considered.
wallet.get_label(key) is now made private, and instead the explicit non-polymorphic
wallet.get_label_for_{address,rhash,txid} alternatives should be used.
- add new index: requests_rhash_to_key (fixes#7845)
- when creating a request, do not save its description in labels.
Instead, return it as default value in wallet.get_label_by_rhash
lnworker:
- rename 'payments' to 'payment_info'
- add note to delete_payment_info
commands: rename 'rmrequest' to 'delete_request'
- separate AddressSynchronizer from Wallet and LNWatcher
- the AddressSynchronizer class is referred to as 'adb' (address database)
- Use callbacks to replace overloaded methods
asyncio.get_event_loop() became deprecated in python3.10. (see https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83710)
```
.../electrum/electrum/daemon.py:470: DeprecationWarning: There is no current event loop
self.asyncio_loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
.../electrum/electrum/network.py:276: DeprecationWarning: There is no current event loop
self.asyncio_loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
```
Also, according to that thread, "set_event_loop() [... is] not deprecated by oversight".
So, we stop using get_event_loop() and set_event_loop() in our own code.
Note that libraries we use (such as the stdlib for python <3.10), might call get_event_loop,
which then relies on us having called set_event_loop e.g. for the GUI thread. To work around
this, a custom event loop policy providing a get_event_loop implementation is used.
Previously, we have been using a single asyncio event loop, created with
util.create_and_start_event_loop, and code in many places got a reference to this loop
using asyncio.get_event_loop().
Now, we still use a single asyncio event loop, but it is now stored as a global in
util._asyncio_event_loop (access with util.get_asyncio_loop()).
I believe these changes also fix https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/5376
Fixes: after adding a payment request, if the process was killed,
the payreq might get lost. In case of using the GUI, neither the
callee nor the caller called wallet.save_db().
Unclear where wallet.save_db() should be called...
Now each method tries to persist their changes by default,
but as an optimisation, the caller can pass write_to_disk=False
e.g. when calling multiple such methods and then call wallet.save_db() itself.
If we had partial writes, which would either rm the need for wallet.save_db()
or at least make it cheaper, this code might get simpler...
related: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/pull/6435
related: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/4823
* Remove check for sign with privkey in init_cmdline
* Add with_privkey and with_wallet variants of signtransaction command
* Add unit tests for signtransaction_with_privkey and signtransaction_with_wallet commands
Adds liquidity hints for the sending capabilities of routing channels in the
graph. The channel blacklist is incorporated into liquidity hints.
Liquidity hints are updated when a payment fails with a temporary
channel failure or when it succeeds. Liquidity hints are used to give a
penalty in the _edge_cost heuristics used by the pathfinding algorithm.
The base penalty in (_edge_cost) is removed because it is now part of the
liquidity penalty. We don't return early from get_distances, as we want
to explore all channels.
- document SwapManager._get_recv_amount and SwapManager._get_send_amount
- change calculations so that they match the boltz-backend
- note that in the reverse swap case, the server does not care about the on-chain claim tx the client
needs to pay for. This introduced some implicit hacks and inconsistencies in the code in the past,
it is still a bit ugly but at least this is now explicit.
- SwapManager._get_recv_amount and SwapManager._get_send_amount are now proper inverses of each other
-----
Here are some code snippets to play around with in Qt console.
For the forward swap case:
```
from electrum import ecc; lnworker = wallet.lnworker; sm = lnworker.swap_manager
invoice = network.run_from_another_thread(lnworker.create_invoice(amount_msat=3000000*1000, message="swap", expiry=86400))[1]; request_data = {"type": "submarine", "pairId": "BTC/BTC", "orderSide": "sell", "invoice": invoice, "refundPublicKey": ecc.GENERATOR.get_public_key_bytes().hex()}
network.send_http_on_proxy('post', sm.api_url + '/createswap', json=request_data, timeout=30)
sm.get_send_amount(3000000, is_reverse=False)
sm.get_recv_amount(3026730, is_reverse=False)
```
For the reverse swap case:
```
from electrum import ecc; import os; lnworker = wallet.lnworker; sm = lnworker.swap_manager
request_data = {"type": "reversesubmarine", "pairId": "BTC/BTC", "orderSide": "buy", "invoiceAmount": 3000000, "preimageHash": os.urandom(32).hex(), "claimPublicKey": ecc.GENERATOR.get_public_key_bytes().hex()}
network.send_http_on_proxy('post', sm.api_url + '/createswap', json=request_data, timeout=30)
sm.get_recv_amount(3000000, is_reverse=True)
sm.get_send_amount(2974443, is_reverse=True)
```
- use_recoverable_channel is a user setting, available
only in standard wallets with a 'segwit' seed_type
- if enabled, 'lightning_xprv' is derived from seed
- otherwise, wallets use the existing 'lightning_privkey2'
Recoverable channels:
- channel recovery data is added funding tx using an OP_RETURN
- recovery data = 4 magic bytes + node id[0:16]
- recovery data is chacha20 encrypted using funding_address as nonce.
(this will allow to fund multiple channels in the same tx)
GUI:
- whether channels are recoverable is shown in wallet info dialog.
- if the wallet can have recoverable channels but has an old node_id,
users are told to close their channels and restore from seed
to have that feature.
Exclude unconfirmed transactions from --to_height and include them into --from_height.
The reason being that an unconfirmed transaction will end up eventually into the last
block which most of the time will be higher than --from_height
