..also export preimage in check_hold_invoice return value if available.
I intentionally did not return the preimage in the returned dict of
wallet.export_requests as this seems risky to do considering some users
of the cli might forward the response to a payer and the payserver
exposes it too.
Closes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/10176
Enforce that the information used to create a bolt11 invoice using
`get_bolt11_invoice()` is similar to the related instance of PaymentInfo
by requiring a PaymentInfo as argument for `get_bolt11_invoice()`.
This way the invoice cannot differ from the created PaymentInfo.
This allows to use the information in PaymentInfo for validation of
incoming htlcs more reliably.
To cover all required information for the creation of a b11 invoice the
PaymentInfo class has to be extended with a expiry and
min_final_cltv_expiry. This requires a db upgrade.
Fixes AttributeError when trying to get `num_sats_can_receive()` in
wallets without lnworker. Fixes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/8100#issuecomment-3294556043.
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/electrum/gui/qt/request_list.py", line 103, in selection_changed
self.receive_tab.update_current_request()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/electrum/gui/qt/receive_tab.py", line 237, in update_current_request
help_texts = self.wallet.get_help_texts_for_receive_request(req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/electrum/wallet.py", line 3446, in get_help_texts_for_receive_request
can_receive = self.lnworker.num_sats_can_receive()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'num_sats_can_receive'
```
I don't understand what the "coins not used" comment meant here.
It was added in the change away from the old config.WALLET_BATCH_RBF option
(ab14c3e138).
The `coins` param *is used* in wallet.get_candidates_for_batching.
Without setting that, the returned set of candidates was restricted to
only base txs that had a large enough change output to cover *all* the newly added outputs.
Instead, it is desirable to allow adding new inputs.
Also suggest a submarine swap if the user creates a 0 amount invoice and
has 0 sat incoming liquidity as it won't be possible to receive
anything.
Users potentially just open a channel, then want to create a lightning invoice
without amount like they are used to from onchain addresses, and then
wonder why receiving doesn't work. So we should at least propose a swap
if there is no inbound liquidity at all.
closes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/10119
also:
- wallet.get_onchain_history was broken with from_height/to_height args
- "show_fees" param is and was non-existent. fees are always added to output
- MyEncoder(json.JSONEncoder) changed a bit:
- I am pretty sure cutting the last 3 chars was intended to cut off the seconds
- however that was making incorrect assumptions about what datetime.isoformat() returns
- which depends on whether microsecond precision is available or whether an explicit timezone is set
- this now makes it clear that we want minutes-resolution, but still leaves the timezone-ambiguity
Adapts the gui(s) to detect if an existing reserve input has not been
used as input for the transaction even though the user tried to spend
max. This allows to show the lightning reserve warning not only for
reserve change outputs but also for existing reserve inputs that have
been ignored for this max spend transaction.
Still keeps the `is_utxo_reserve` flag on `PartialTxOutput` as it is
used in the qml gui.
Right now if a ln reserve is required and there is already a reserve
sized utxo available, `make_unsigned_transaction()` will still add the
reserve as input to a 'spend max' transaction and add a reserve change
output. This seems wasteful, this patch instead just removes the input
so it is not spent at all.
Watching-only wallets can have a keystore.
It was actually keystore.may_have_password() that was filtering them out but that was not really obvious.
Better to be explicit I think.
Adds a new configvar `WALLET_PARTIAL_WRITES` to enable/disable partial writes for the walletDB.
This is a further restriction on top of the existing restrictions,
e.g. wallet files still need to have file encryption disabled for partial writes.
It defaults to off, so even for unencrypted wallets we disable partial writes for now.
This is used as a stopgap measure until we fix the issues found with the partial writes impl
(see https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/10000).