Invalidate existing sessions on password change/reset (B-34)
Neither self-service password change nor the admin reset invalidated already-issued JWTs — a 24h-lifetime token stayed valid regardless, so a stolen token (or an attacker who already had the old password) kept working past a password change meant to lock them out. The admin reset exists precisely for the "account compromised" case and didn't evict the attacker at all. Add User.token_version (migration 943dbd74d983), embedded in every JWT as a "tv" claim and checked against the DB on every request in get_current_user/get_optional_user; a mismatch reads as session_expired. Both change-password and the admin reset bump it. change-password hands back a freshly minted token so the caller's own session keeps working instead of being logged out by its own request; the admin reset does not, since that session isn't the one making the call. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
|||||||
# Known bugs
|
# Known bugs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A second full-codebase audit on 2026-07-27 found **25 further issues** (4 critical, 6 high,
|
A second full-codebase audit on 2026-07-27 found **25 further issues** (4 critical, 6 high,
|
||||||
7 medium, 8 low), listed below as B-33 … B-49. B-25 through B-33 are fixed (see "Previously
|
7 medium, 8 low), listed below as B-33 … B-49. B-25 through B-34 are fixed (see "Previously
|
||||||
fixed" below) — no Critical-severity finding remains open; the other 16 are High/Medium/Low.
|
fixed" below) — no Critical-severity finding remains open; the other 15 are High/Medium/Low.
|
||||||
The 139-test suite was green at the time of the audit, so none of these were caught by existing
|
The 139-test suite was green at the time of the audit, so none of these were caught by existing
|
||||||
coverage — every fix lands with a regression test (the nine fixes so far brought the suite
|
coverage — every fix lands with a regression test (the ten fixes so far brought the suite
|
||||||
from 139 to 192).
|
from 139 to 194).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The recurring pattern across the open findings is worth stating once: the code is rigorous
|
The recurring pattern across the open findings is worth stating once: the code is rigorous
|
||||||
about the failure modes that have actually been hit, and silent about the ones that have not.
|
about the failure modes that have actually been hit, and silent about the ones that have not.
|
||||||
@@ -18,21 +18,6 @@ single-process assumptions, no user-facing history, etc.), see "Known gaps / TOD
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## High
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### B-34 — Password change and admin reset do not invalidate existing sessions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Neither `/users/me/change-password` nor `/admin/users/{id}/reset-password` invalidates
|
|
||||||
already-issued JWTs (24h default lifetime, no revocation, no `token_version` on the user). The
|
|
||||||
admin reset exists precisely for the "account compromised" case and **does not evict the
|
|
||||||
attacker**.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Proposed fix.** Add a `token_version` (or `password_changed_at`) column on `User`, embed it
|
|
||||||
in the JWT claims, and reject any token whose value is stale in
|
|
||||||
`auth/dependencies.py:get_current_user`. Bump it on both endpoints.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Medium
|
## Medium
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### B-35 — Every API timestamp is naive, so the frontend renders it in the wrong timezone
|
### B-35 — Every API timestamp is naive, so the frontend renders it in the wrong timezone
|
||||||
@@ -212,9 +197,10 @@ already does.
|
|||||||
- **B-31** — resubscribing on reconnect ran serially before anything else started, freezing the chain tip (and so an in-flight draw) for the whole sweep
|
- **B-31** — resubscribing on reconnect ran serially before anything else started, freezing the chain tip (and so an in-flight draw) for the whole sweep
|
||||||
- **B-32** — an RBF bump's fee delta could fall below BIP125's relay-mandated minimum, so the node rejected it and the same tick retried identically forever; also had no ceiling on how high the fee rate could climb
|
- **B-32** — an RBF bump's fee delta could fall below BIP125's relay-mandated minimum, so the node rejected it and the same tick retried identically forever; also had no ceiling on how high the fee rate could climb
|
||||||
- **B-33** — `POST /auth/login` had no rate limiting on a custodial wallet, so a patient distributed attack could brute-force a password against an enumerable username list; fixed with per-username *and* per-IP exponential backoff (`app/auth/rate_limit.py`), registration throttled per-IP too (also bounds B-31's attacker-controlled user count)
|
- **B-33** — `POST /auth/login` had no rate limiting on a custodial wallet, so a patient distributed attack could brute-force a password against an enumerable username list; fixed with per-username *and* per-IP exponential backoff (`app/auth/rate_limit.py`), registration throttled per-IP too (also bounds B-31's attacker-controlled user count)
|
||||||
|
- **B-34** — neither self-service password change nor the admin reset invalidated already-issued JWTs, so a stolen token (or an attacker's own session) survived a password change meant to lock it out; fixed with a `User.token_version` column embedded in every JWT (`"tv"` claim) and checked on every request in `get_current_user`/`get_optional_user`, bumped on both endpoints — change-password hands back a fresh token so the caller's own session keeps working, the admin reset does not
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See git history for the fix-by-fix breakdown (commits `f13f685`, `50a43ae`, `933760e`, and the
|
See git history for the fix-by-fix breakdown (commits `f13f685`, `50a43ae`, `933760e`, and the
|
||||||
B-28/B-29/B-30/B-31/B-32/B-33 fixes). Suite grew from 139 to 192 tests over the nine.
|
B-28/B-29/B-30/B-31/B-32/B-33/B-34 fixes). Suite grew from 139 to 194 tests over the ten.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A full-codebase audit on 2026-07-26 (commit `d4e0974`) found 24 bugs across every Python
|
A full-codebase audit on 2026-07-26 (commit `d4e0974`) found 24 bugs across every Python
|
||||||
module under `app/`, both static frontends, and the Docker/Caddy deployment — 5 critical,
|
module under `app/`, both static frontends, and the Docker/Caddy deployment — 5 critical,
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ async def reset_user_password(
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
new_password = secrets.token_urlsafe(12)
|
new_password = secrets.token_urlsafe(12)
|
||||||
user.password_hash = hash_password(new_password)
|
user.password_hash = hash_password(new_password)
|
||||||
|
# B-34: this endpoint exists precisely for the "account compromised" case —
|
||||||
|
# without bumping token_version, whoever was already logged in (the
|
||||||
|
# attacker, if that's who prompted the reset) stayed logged in on their
|
||||||
|
# existing token until it naturally expired, unaffected by the reset.
|
||||||
|
user.token_version += 1
|
||||||
await write_audit_log(session, "admin_password_reset", {"user_id": user_id}, user_id=user_id)
|
await write_audit_log(session, "admin_password_reset", {"user_id": user_id}, user_id=user_id)
|
||||||
await session.commit()
|
await session.commit()
|
||||||
return AdminPasswordResetResponse(username=user.username, new_password=new_password)
|
return AdminPasswordResetResponse(username=user.username, new_password=new_password)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+15
-3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
from app.api.errors import http_error
|
from app.api.errors import http_error
|
||||||
from app.auth.dependencies import get_current_user
|
from app.auth.dependencies import get_current_user
|
||||||
from app.auth.security import MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH, hash_password, verify_password
|
from app.auth.security import MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH, create_access_token, hash_password, verify_password
|
||||||
from app.db.models import Round, RoundParticipant, User
|
from app.db.models import Round, RoundParticipant, User
|
||||||
from app.db.session import get_session
|
from app.db.session import get_session
|
||||||
from app.wallet.balance import compute_pending_balance
|
from app.wallet.balance import compute_pending_balance
|
||||||
@@ -45,12 +45,16 @@ class ChangePasswordRequest(BaseModel):
|
|||||||
new_password: str
|
new_password: str
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@router.post("/me/change-password", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
|
class ChangePasswordResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||||
|
access_token: str
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@router.post("/me/change-password", response_model=ChangePasswordResponse)
|
||||||
async def change_password(
|
async def change_password(
|
||||||
body: ChangePasswordRequest,
|
body: ChangePasswordRequest,
|
||||||
user: User = Depends(get_current_user),
|
user: User = Depends(get_current_user),
|
||||||
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_session),
|
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_session),
|
||||||
) -> None:
|
) -> ChangePasswordResponse:
|
||||||
"""Self-service password change — requires the current password, unlike the
|
"""Self-service password change — requires the current password, unlike the
|
||||||
admin-only /admin/users/{id}/reset-password (which is for a user who's
|
admin-only /admin/users/{id}/reset-password (which is for a user who's
|
||||||
actually locked out and can't provide it)."""
|
actually locked out and can't provide it)."""
|
||||||
@@ -67,7 +71,15 @@ async def change_password(
|
|||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
user.password_hash = hash_password(body.new_password)
|
user.password_hash = hash_password(body.new_password)
|
||||||
|
# B-34: bumping token_version invalidates every token issued before this
|
||||||
|
# point — including this very request's own bearer token, and any an
|
||||||
|
# attacker who knew the old password might be holding. A fresh token is
|
||||||
|
# handed back so *this* session keeps working without forcing a re-login;
|
||||||
|
# every other open session (this user's other devices, or an attacker's)
|
||||||
|
# gets "session_expired" on its next request.
|
||||||
|
user.token_version += 1
|
||||||
await session.commit()
|
await session.commit()
|
||||||
|
return ChangePasswordResponse(access_token=create_access_token(user.id, user.token_version))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
class LastRoundResultResponse(BaseModel):
|
class LastRoundResultResponse(BaseModel):
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -16,13 +16,19 @@ async def get_current_user(
|
|||||||
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_session),
|
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_session),
|
||||||
) -> User:
|
) -> User:
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
user_id = decode_access_token(credentials.credentials)
|
user_id, token_version = decode_access_token(credentials.credentials)
|
||||||
except Exception as exc:
|
except Exception as exc:
|
||||||
raise http_error(status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, "session_expired", "invalid token") from exc
|
raise http_error(status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, "session_expired", "invalid token") from exc
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
user = await session.scalar(select(User).where(User.id == user_id))
|
user = await session.scalar(select(User).where(User.id == user_id))
|
||||||
if user is None:
|
if user is None:
|
||||||
raise http_error(status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, "session_expired", "user not found")
|
raise http_error(status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, "session_expired", "user not found")
|
||||||
|
if user.token_version != token_version:
|
||||||
|
# B-34: a password change (self-service or admin reset) bumps
|
||||||
|
# token_version, so a token issued before it — including one an
|
||||||
|
# attacker who had the old password is still holding — reads as
|
||||||
|
# expired rather than staying valid until it naturally times out.
|
||||||
|
raise http_error(status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, "session_expired", "token has been superseded")
|
||||||
return user
|
return user
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -37,7 +43,10 @@ async def get_optional_user(
|
|||||||
if not auth_header.startswith("Bearer "):
|
if not auth_header.startswith("Bearer "):
|
||||||
return None
|
return None
|
||||||
try:
|
try:
|
||||||
user_id = decode_access_token(auth_header.removeprefix("Bearer "))
|
user_id, token_version = decode_access_token(auth_header.removeprefix("Bearer "))
|
||||||
except Exception:
|
except Exception:
|
||||||
return None
|
return None
|
||||||
return await session.scalar(select(User).where(User.id == user_id))
|
user = await session.scalar(select(User).where(User.id == user_id))
|
||||||
|
if user is None or user.token_version != token_version:
|
||||||
|
return None
|
||||||
|
return user
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+6
-2
@@ -111,7 +111,9 @@ async def register(
|
|||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
await session.refresh(user)
|
await session.refresh(user)
|
||||||
request.app.state.electrum_listener.address_for_new_user(user.id, user.address)
|
request.app.state.electrum_listener.address_for_new_user(user.id, user.address)
|
||||||
return TokenResponse(access_token=create_access_token(user.id), address=user.address)
|
return TokenResponse(
|
||||||
|
access_token=create_access_token(user.id, user.token_version), address=user.address
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
raise http_error(
|
raise http_error(
|
||||||
status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT,
|
status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT,
|
||||||
@@ -148,4 +150,6 @@ async def login(
|
|||||||
# on its own, so one correct login can't be used to wipe out an IP's failure
|
# on its own, so one correct login can't be used to wipe out an IP's failure
|
||||||
# count while it's mid-attack against other accounts.
|
# count while it's mid-attack against other accounts.
|
||||||
limiters.login.record_success(username_key)
|
limiters.login.record_success(username_key)
|
||||||
return TokenResponse(access_token=create_access_token(user.id), address=user.address)
|
return TokenResponse(
|
||||||
|
access_token=create_access_token(user.id, user.token_version), address=user.address
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+12
-4
@@ -39,12 +39,20 @@ def verify_password(password: str, password_hash: str) -> bool:
|
|||||||
return False
|
return False
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def create_access_token(user_id: int) -> str:
|
def create_access_token(user_id: int, token_version: int = 0) -> str:
|
||||||
expires_at = datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(minutes=settings.jwt_expire_minutes)
|
expires_at = datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(minutes=settings.jwt_expire_minutes)
|
||||||
payload = {"sub": str(user_id), "exp": expires_at}
|
# "tv" lets get_current_user (app/auth/dependencies.py) reject a token issued
|
||||||
|
# before the account's password was last changed (B-34): change-password and
|
||||||
|
# the admin reset both bump User.token_version, so every token that still
|
||||||
|
# carries the old value stops working immediately instead of staying valid
|
||||||
|
# for up to jwt_expire_minutes after a compromise is supposedly handled.
|
||||||
|
payload = {"sub": str(user_id), "tv": token_version, "exp": expires_at}
|
||||||
return jwt.encode(payload, settings.jwt_secret, algorithm=settings.jwt_algorithm)
|
return jwt.encode(payload, settings.jwt_secret, algorithm=settings.jwt_algorithm)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def decode_access_token(token: str) -> int:
|
def decode_access_token(token: str) -> tuple[int, int]:
|
||||||
payload = jwt.decode(token, settings.jwt_secret, algorithms=[settings.jwt_algorithm])
|
payload = jwt.decode(token, settings.jwt_secret, algorithms=[settings.jwt_algorithm])
|
||||||
return int(payload["sub"])
|
# .get(..., 0) covers tokens issued before "tv" existed (pre-B-34 deploy) —
|
||||||
|
# they carry no claim at all, and 0 is what a freshly migrated user's
|
||||||
|
# token_version starts at, so those sessions keep working across the deploy.
|
||||||
|
return int(payload["sub"]), int(payload.get("tv", 0))
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ class User(Base):
|
|||||||
# Read cache only; must always be written in the same transaction as the
|
# Read cache only; must always be written in the same transaction as the
|
||||||
# utxo_events rows it summarizes. Source of truth is utxo_events.
|
# utxo_events rows it summarizes. Source of truth is utxo_events.
|
||||||
cached_balance_sats: Mapped[int] = mapped_column(BigInteger, default=0)
|
cached_balance_sats: Mapped[int] = mapped_column(BigInteger, default=0)
|
||||||
|
# Embedded in every issued JWT (app/auth/security.py) and checked on every
|
||||||
|
# request (app/auth/dependencies.py:get_current_user). Bumped on a
|
||||||
|
# self-service or admin password change so every token issued before that
|
||||||
|
# point stops working immediately, instead of staying valid for up to
|
||||||
|
# jwt_expire_minutes after a compromised account's password is reset (B-34).
|
||||||
|
token_version: Mapped[int] = mapped_column(default=0, server_default="0")
|
||||||
created_at: Mapped[datetime] = mapped_column(default=utcnow)
|
created_at: Mapped[datetime] = mapped_column(default=utcnow)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+6
-1
@@ -749,10 +749,15 @@ async function changePassword() {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
await withLoading(btn, t('loading.updating'), async () => {
|
await withLoading(btn, t('loading.updating'), async () => {
|
||||||
try {
|
try {
|
||||||
await call('POST', '/users/me/change-password', {
|
const data = await call('POST', '/users/me/change-password', {
|
||||||
current_password: currentPassword,
|
current_password: currentPassword,
|
||||||
new_password: newPassword,
|
new_password: newPassword,
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
|
// The server just invalidated every previously issued token (B-34) —
|
||||||
|
// including the one this very request was authenticated with — and
|
||||||
|
// handed back a fresh one so this tab doesn't get logged out too.
|
||||||
|
token = data.access_token;
|
||||||
|
localStorage.setItem('plm_token', token);
|
||||||
document.getElementById('settings-current-password').value = '';
|
document.getElementById('settings-current-password').value = '';
|
||||||
document.getElementById('settings-new-password').value = '';
|
document.getElementById('settings-new-password').value = '';
|
||||||
document.getElementById('settings-new-password-confirm').value = '';
|
document.getElementById('settings-new-password-confirm').value = '';
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|||||||
|
"""add token_version to users
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Revision ID: 943dbd74d983
|
||||||
|
Revises: 861e76aaf34c
|
||||||
|
Create Date: 2026-07-27
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
from typing import Sequence, Union
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from alembic import op
|
||||||
|
import sqlalchemy as sa
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# revision identifiers, used by Alembic.
|
||||||
|
revision: str = '943dbd74d983'
|
||||||
|
down_revision: Union[str, Sequence[str], None] = '861e76aaf34c'
|
||||||
|
branch_labels: Union[str, Sequence[str], None] = None
|
||||||
|
depends_on: Union[str, Sequence[str], None] = None
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def upgrade() -> None:
|
||||||
|
"""Upgrade schema."""
|
||||||
|
# server_default backfills every existing user to 0 (their current sessions
|
||||||
|
# stay valid, since 0 also matches what already-issued tokens carry
|
||||||
|
# implicitly — see the "sub"-only tokens issued before this migration);
|
||||||
|
# dropped right after so new rows go through the ORM default instead of a
|
||||||
|
# stale constant.
|
||||||
|
op.add_column(
|
||||||
|
'users', sa.Column('token_version', sa.Integer(), nullable=False, server_default='0')
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
with op.batch_alter_table('users') as batch_op:
|
||||||
|
batch_op.alter_column('token_version', server_default=None)
|
||||||
|
# ### end Alembic commands ###
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def downgrade() -> None:
|
||||||
|
"""Downgrade schema."""
|
||||||
|
# ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
|
||||||
|
op.drop_column('users', 'token_version')
|
||||||
|
# ### end Alembic commands ###
|
||||||
@@ -205,6 +205,10 @@ async def test_admin_resets_user_password(client):
|
|||||||
assert refreshed.password_hash != old_hash
|
assert refreshed.password_hash != old_hash
|
||||||
assert verify_password(new_password, refreshed.password_hash)
|
assert verify_password(new_password, refreshed.password_hash)
|
||||||
assert not verify_password("original-password", refreshed.password_hash)
|
assert not verify_password("original-password", refreshed.password_hash)
|
||||||
|
# B-34: the reset must bump token_version so a session opened before
|
||||||
|
# the reset (e.g. an attacker who had the old password) is evicted
|
||||||
|
# immediately rather than staying valid until the JWT naturally expires.
|
||||||
|
assert refreshed.token_version == 1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def test_admin_reset_password_requires_token(client):
|
async def test_admin_reset_password_requires_token(client):
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -9,8 +9,21 @@ def test_password_hash_roundtrip():
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_jwt_roundtrip(monkeypatch):
|
def test_jwt_roundtrip(monkeypatch):
|
||||||
monkeypatch.setattr(security.settings, "jwt_secret", "test-secret")
|
monkeypatch.setattr(security.settings, "jwt_secret", "test-secret")
|
||||||
token = security.create_access_token(user_id=42)
|
token = security.create_access_token(user_id=42, token_version=3)
|
||||||
assert security.decode_access_token(token) == 42
|
assert security.decode_access_token(token) == (42, 3)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def test_jwt_decode_defaults_token_version_for_tokens_issued_before_it_existed(monkeypatch):
|
||||||
|
"""B-34: a token minted before the "tv" claim existed has no such key at
|
||||||
|
all. It must still decode — as token_version 0, matching a freshly
|
||||||
|
migrated user's starting value — rather than raising or being treated as
|
||||||
|
permanently stale."""
|
||||||
|
import jwt as pyjwt
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
monkeypatch.setattr(security.settings, "jwt_secret", "test-secret")
|
||||||
|
payload = {"sub": "42"}
|
||||||
|
token = pyjwt.encode(payload, "test-secret", algorithm=security.settings.jwt_algorithm)
|
||||||
|
assert security.decode_access_token(token) == (42, 0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def test_verify_password_returns_false_for_an_unparseable_hash():
|
def test_verify_password_returns_false_for_an_unparseable_hash():
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ async def test_change_password_updates_login(client):
|
|||||||
headers=headers,
|
headers=headers,
|
||||||
json={"current_password": "original-password", "new_password": "brand-new-password"},
|
json={"current_password": "original-password", "new_password": "brand-new-password"},
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
assert resp.status_code == 204
|
assert resp.status_code == 200
|
||||||
|
assert resp.json()["access_token"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
resp = await client.post("/auth/login", json={"username": "alice", "password": "original-password"})
|
resp = await client.post("/auth/login", json={"username": "alice", "password": "original-password"})
|
||||||
assert resp.status_code == 401
|
assert resp.status_code == 401
|
||||||
@@ -90,6 +91,36 @@ async def test_change_password_updates_login(client):
|
|||||||
assert resp.status_code == 200
|
assert resp.status_code == 200
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
async def test_change_password_invalidates_the_old_token_but_not_the_new_one(client):
|
||||||
|
"""B-34: neither self-service change-password nor the admin reset used to
|
||||||
|
invalidate already-issued JWTs, so a stolen token (or an attacker who
|
||||||
|
already had the old password) stayed logged in until the token's natural
|
||||||
|
24h expiry — even past a password change meant to lock them out."""
|
||||||
|
old_token = await _register(client)
|
||||||
|
old_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {old_token}"}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
resp = await client.post(
|
||||||
|
"/users/me/change-password",
|
||||||
|
headers=old_headers,
|
||||||
|
json={"current_password": "original-password", "new_password": "brand-new-password"},
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
assert resp.status_code == 200
|
||||||
|
new_token = resp.json()["access_token"]
|
||||||
|
assert new_token != old_token
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# The old token (what an attacker holding the old password would still
|
||||||
|
# have) is now rejected...
|
||||||
|
resp = await client.get("/users/me", headers=old_headers)
|
||||||
|
assert resp.status_code == 401
|
||||||
|
assert resp.json()["detail"]["code"] == "session_expired"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# ...but the freshly issued one keeps this same session working, so the
|
||||||
|
# user who just changed their own password isn't logged out too.
|
||||||
|
new_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {new_token}"}
|
||||||
|
resp = await client.get("/users/me", headers=new_headers)
|
||||||
|
assert resp.status_code == 200
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def test_change_password_rejects_too_short(client):
|
async def test_change_password_rejects_too_short(client):
|
||||||
token = await _register(client)
|
token = await _register(client)
|
||||||
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}
|
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user