reproducibility probably needs a hardcoded userid
Also, move the UID arg later in the dockerfiles, for better caching.
(if local dev build and repro build set different UIDs, the build caches
will diverge at that step)
fixes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/8011
> Upgraded from Appimage 4.1.5 to 4.3.2 on MX-Linux 19.
> The new version fails to start with:
>
> ```
> $ electrum
> qt.qpa.plugin: Could not load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "" even though it was found.
> This application failed to start because no Qt platform plugin could be initialized. Reinstalling the application may > fix this problem.
>
> Available platform plugins are: eglfs, linuxfb, minimal, minimalegl, offscreen, vnc, wayland-egl, wayland, wayland-xcomposite-egl, wayland-xcomposite-glx, webgl, xcb.
>
> Aborted (core dumped)
> ```
debian 10 only distributes libxcb-util0.
debian 11 distributes libxcb-util1.
our base image atm is debian 10, so we build the package from source.
This includes two logically separate changes:
- on the host, try not to require sudo when running the build scripts
- namely when interacting with the docker daemon, this requires
the unix user on the host to be part of the `docker` group
- this solves part of https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/7602
- while running inside the docker containers, do not run as root
- this means that e.g. files created in mounted folders should
no longer be owned by root on the host
- there is some code duplication involved here - not sure
how it could be deduped.
fixes#7198
We recently bumped the bundled version of PyQt (5.14.2->5.15.4).
It seems the new version has a lot more dynamic dependencies.
From https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/linux-requirements.html :
> From Qt 5.15 onwards, Qt does require libxcb 1.11. Also, the -qt-xcb
> configure option got removed that was bundling some of the libs below.
We are using the prebuilt wheels for PyQt5 from PyPI. Presumably those
had previously been built using the -qt-xcb option.
Ubuntu 20.04 needs `libxcb-xinerama.so.0`
and Debian 10 needs `libxcb-util.so.1` for the Qt `xcb` plugin.
-----
ported from https://github.com/Electron-Cash/Electron-Cash/commit/380f04a8054fe9fd9169721089c5da360f9d0807
see https://github.com/Electron-Cash/Electron-Cash/issues/2196
-----
In particular, see this comment:
>> I confirmed that both Ubuntu 20.04 and Debian 10.8 clean install have an issue with the 4.2.4 AppImage.
>
> Any idea what broke it? I assume it used to work.
Yes, it did work in 4.2.3 which used PyQt5 5.13.2. I just had a look at the xcb plugin and it definitely has less dependencies:
```
ago@ubuntu2004vm:~/src/Electron-Cash/dist$ ldd squashfs-root/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/PyQt5/Qt/plugins/platforms/libqxcb.so|grep xcb
libX11-xcb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11-xcb.so.1 (0x00007f0ec9d07000)
libxcb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f0ec9cdd000)
libxcb-xkb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xkb.so.1 (0x00007f0ec6ead000)
```
compared to PyQt5 5.15.2 in 4.2.4:
```
ago@ubuntu2004vm:~/src/Electron-Cash/dist$ ldd squashfs-root/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/PyQt5/Qt/plugins/platforms/libqxcb.so|grep xcb
libX11-xcb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11-xcb.so.1 (0x00007fcb5715f000)
libxcb-icccm.so.4 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-icccm.so.4 (0x00007fcb57158000)
libxcb-image.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-image.so.0 (0x00007fcb56f51000)
libxcb-shm.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-shm.so.0 (0x00007fcb56f4c000)
libxcb-util.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-util.so.1 (0x00007fcb56d46000)
libxcb-keysyms.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-keysyms.so.1 (0x00007fcb56d41000)
libxcb-randr.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-randr.so.0 (0x00007fcb56d2e000)
libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0x00007fcb56d27000)
libxcb-render.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x00007fcb56d16000)
libxcb-shape.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-shape.so.0 (0x00007fcb56d11000)
libxcb-sync.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-sync.so.1 (0x00007fcb56d07000)
libxcb-xfixes.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xfixes.so.0 (0x00007fcb56cfd000)
libxcb-xinerama.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xinerama.so.0 (0x00007fcb56cf8000)
libxcb-xkb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xkb.so.1 (0x00007fcb56cda000)
libxcb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007fcb56cae000)
```
Had to also bump ubuntu version 18.04->20.04,
as was getting errors running the self-compiled pyinstaller otherwise (weird...):
```
from .utils.git import get_repo_revision
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'PyInstaller.utils'
```
(similar to https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller/issues/4403 )
-----
Note re appimage: when trying to compile python 3.8.x on ubuntu 16.04, I am getting:
./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function ‘os_copy_file_range_impl’:
./Modules/posixmodule.c:10351:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘copy_file_range’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ret = copy_file_range(src, p_offset_src, dst, p_offset_dst, count, flags);
This is because ubuntu 16.04 has too old glibc.
This slightly increases the AppImage size but allows us to be more
compatible with older distributions.
-----
taken from Electron-Cash/Electron-Cash@96644acd6f
SomberNight