BIP44_COIN_TYPE was accidentally set to 0 (Bitcoin mainnet), which would
cause BTCP wallets to derive keys identical to Bitcoin mainnet wallets from
the same seed. Restored to 13496 (provisional private constant matching the
BTCP P2P port) per tecnichal-data.md spec; updated table entry and test.
Also fixes a race condition in TestPeerDirectAnchors::test_payments_stresstest:
gath.cancel() was called immediately after OldTaskGroup exited, without any
await, so the event loop never ran the message-loop tasks to drain the final
revoke_and_ack for the last batch of 5 concurrent HTLCs. Added
asyncio.sleep(0) to yield one event-loop iteration before cancelling.
Full run: pytest tests -v, Python 3.12.3, pytest 9.0.3, ~3:30 min.
Documents pass/skip counts per file, reasons for the 6 upstream-skipped tests,
BTCP-specific coverage, and flaky test fixes applied in this session.
SimpleConfig.path differs from electrum_path when the active network has a
subdirectory (e.g. BitcoinPurple mainnet). Tests that wrote directly to
electrum_path were resolving the wrong directory; use config.path consistently.
Also reorder setUp() so config is created before any path-dependent operations
- test_reestablish_fake_data: add 3-attempt retry per pay_invoice call to handle
asyncio event-loop pressure on sequential payments
- test_htlc_switch_iteration_benchmark: raise timeout 2s → 5s
- test_payment_multipart_trampoline_e2e: attempts 1 → 3
- _run_trampoline_payment: default attempts 2 → 5; add outer retry loop catching
NoPathFound (raised when all fee levels fail, bypassing the attempts counter)
- test_mpp_expiry (anchor): replace fixed asyncio.sleep with a polling loop that
waits until bob has received both HTLCs before asserting MPP state
Two fixes:
1. test_trampoline_mpp_consolidation: set dave.MPP_EXPIRY=120 when
test_mpp_consolidation=True. With MPP_EXPIRY=2s and sequential HTLC
commitment rounds, Dave times out before the second HTLC arrives.
2. test_reestablish_fake_data: use explicit Task references in the
payment setup phase so that loop tasks (message loops, htlc_switch)
are cancelled in a finally block regardless of whether pay() succeeds
or raises. Without this, asyncio.gather leaves orphaned tasks running
across sub-test iterations when a payment fails, causing interference
If a trampoline forwarder fails to find a path, it may return a list
of trampolines it knows how to reach, so that clients can add these
trampolines to their route.
The list of trampolines and fees is written in the error data of
the 'update_fail_htlc' message.
The LnAddr, lndecode and lnencode naming didn't imply that it is
bolt 11 specific, making it confusing to work with, now that there are
also bolt 12 "lnaddr".
Renaming it to *bolt11* creates a clear separation to bolt 12 things and
reduces mental load.
This commit is pure renaming (using the PyCharm IDE refactor function),
except for the removal of the `object` inheritance of LnAddr/BOLT11Addr,
this is Python 2 legacy.
On master fw_fail_htlc is, especially on the CI, flaky.
We mine 100 blocks, then wait fixed 5 seconds, then check if bob has
failed back the htlcs to alice.
However if the test runs slowly (CI) 5 seconds can be too short
for bob to catch up to the new 100 mined blocks.
Instead we should just use the wait_until_htlcs_settled helper function
which polls Alice local_unsettled_sent with 30 sec timeout, allowing bob
to take a bit longer (or be faster) than 5 s.
```
.***** test_fw_fail_htlc ******
initializing alice
funding alice
a101c8c4c22043ff42029bcab2f0bf6ce5482a60d656294cbec3a4df557e2687
initializing bob
funding bob
d323d572c54817116d185c91f15e449550c651eb4ed76891d3011e0a8eb4ef9a
initializing carol
funding carol
bbf3503663876a4ae00f70c7e58ad49318e83d5cf99d6effe692e113d10910c2
mining 1 blocks
starting daemon (PID 5559)
/tmp/alice/regtest/wallets/default_wallet
true
starting daemon (PID 5577)
/tmp/bob/regtest/wallets/default_wallet
true
starting daemon (PID 5595)
/tmp/carol/regtest/wallets/default_wallet
true
alice and carol open channels with bob
mining 3 blocks
wait until alice sees channel open.
wait until alice sees channel open..
wait until alice sees channel open...
alice pays carol
Daemon stopped
mining 1 blocks
mining 150 blocks
wait until 99ad1d44b9054f5a85c2fb45e9a9b93eb13c785104ed0664be5cf866d79d38fc:2 is spent.
...
wait until 99ad1d44b9054f5a85c2fb45e9a9b93eb13c785104ed0664be5cf866d79d38fc:2 is spent............................
mining 1 blocks
mining 100 blocks
alice htlc was not failed
FDaemon stopped
```
This test was flaky: the mpp_set resolution gets set to SETTLING several asyncio event loop iterations before the hold invoice callback "cb" gets called.
If the 0.1 sec polling triggers just in the middle of that interval, `assert cb_got_called` fails.
```
async def check_mpp_state():
async def wait_for_resolution():
while True:
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
if payment_key not in bob_w.received_mpp_htlcs:
continue
if not bob_w.received_mpp_htlcs[payment_key].resolution == RecvMPPResolution.SETTLING:
continue
return
await util.wait_for2(wait_for_resolution(), timeout=2)
> assert cb_got_called
E assert False
tests/test_lnpeer.py:1898: AssertionError
```
see https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/16c8cb50e38c274cce8f9f66f28d8dd453f9f074/electrum/lnpeer.py#L3136-L3137
fixes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/10589
-----
diff to reproduce the failure without present patch:
```
diff --git a/tests/test_lnpeer.py b/tests/test_lnpeer.py
index 8669931c24..e15973d68f 100644
--- a/tests/test_lnpeer.py
+++ b/tests/test_lnpeer.py
@@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ class TestPeerDirect(TestPeer):
cb_got_called = False
async def cb(_payment_hash):
self.logger.debug(f"hold invoice callback called. {bob_w.network.get_local_height()=}")
+ await asyncio.sleep(1)
nonlocal cb_got_called
cb_got_called = True
```
LNURL-W/P can also be encoded in lud-17 form instead of bech32.
https://github.com/lnurl/luds/blob/luds/17.md
e.g.
lnurlw://example.com/api/test123
lnurlp://example.com/api/test123
Due to how the txid-commitment merkle tree used in the block headers is constructed, we need an extra check to be able to validate the *position* of a txid in a block.
I think this is low severity for us.
See https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=102395 :
> The Merkle hash implementation that Bitcoin uses to calculate the Merkle
> root in a block header is flawed in that one can easily construct multiple
> lists of hashes that map to the same Merkle root.
> For example, merkle_hash([a, b, c]) and merkle_hash([a, b, c, c]) yield
> the same result. This is because, at every iteration, the Merkle hash
> function pads its intermediate list of hashes with the last hash if the
> list is of odd length, in order to make it of even length.
>
> And so, the Merkle root function can be effectively preimaged by
> changing the input so that one of the intermediate lists is of even
> length with the last two elements equal (where originally it was
> of odd length with a last element equal to the earlier mentioned two).
> As was later noted, this extends to any input length that is
> not a power of two:
> merkle_hash([a, b, c, d, e, f]) == merkle_hash([a, b, c, d, e, f, e, f]).
> Note that to maintain the same root hash, the only flexibility that
> exists is duplication of elements.
Ported from https://github.com/Electron-Cash/Electron-Cash/commit/165146362b4cb0ad74770b36aca1f9acb2800195
Co-authored-by: bitcoincashautist <80100588+A60AB5450353F40E@users.noreply.github.com>
Don't include first hop of the path,
this is the hop from us to the first node and we don't
need a payload for ourselves.
Also adds unittest checking this.
Only signal `OPTION_ZEROCONF_OPT` to peers if we either:
1. Have no trusted peer configured (assuming that we are LSP)
2. Have a trusted peer configured, and the peer we are connecting
to is this trusted peer.
Otherwise peers that are LSPs but are not the clients trusted LSP
might try to open a channel to the client but it would get rejected.
Make the just in time channel fees and channel size
configvars, as in practice not every provider would
use the same hardcoded fees or channel sizes.
Add the mining fees required for the funding transaction on top of the
opening fees to prevent opening channels at a loss in a higher
fee environment.
Adds unittests for `LNWallet.open_channel_just_in_time()`,
`LNWallet._cleanup_failed_jit_channel()`,
`LNWallet.can_get_zeroconf_channel()` and
`LNWallet.receive_requires_jit_channel()`.
...so we can have multiple just in time channels with the same lsp.
We already save a remote scid alias in `on_channel_ready` which we
already have received after the new zeroconf channel is in open state.
So setting the alias to the static node id hash is counterproductive
because it doesn't allow to differentiate between channels.
Also extends the regtest (`just_in_time`) to do a second channel
opening, to cover this scenario. This doesn't add much runtime to
the test, so the cost seems reasonable.
On LSP side we were only checking if ACCEPT_ZEROCONF_CHANNELS
is enabled while forwarding a non-trampoline htlc.
During trampoline forwarding the config was ignored.
The ACCEPT_* prefix implied this was only for accepting inbound
zeroconf channels, but it also controls whether we open them when
forwarding HTLCs.
Renames the config var to OPEN_ZEROCONF_CHANNELS
to clarify it enables zeroconf channel opens in both directions,
and add the missing check when forwarding trampoline HTLCs.
Fixes AbstractChannel.update_unfunded_state to stop calling a
non-existent method (unwatch_channel).
Adds unittest to execute the zeroconf path of update_unfunded_state.
Add unittest that verifies we only include r_tags for trampoline nodes
if we signal trampoline support in the invoice_features and only signal
trampoline support if we use trampoline or have only open trampoline
channels.
- could not find a single project that still actually cares about bip70 [0]
- well except maybe BitPay.
- but I cannot test with BitPay:
- they have a testnet3 staging environment on test.bitpay.com
- but the SSL cert they use for bip70 has expired in 2021
- the webUI probably also has not been updated since then...
- they claim to have added LN support in 2022 in a blog post,
but it's not there on test.bitpay.com
- on mainnet, they require KYC before payment
- < ... angry noises >
- their loss then, I don't care.
- this is code that no one wants to maintain
- this does not yet delete the signed bip70 payment data for historical txs
- but it is no longer possible to export it from the GUI
[0]: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/bip70-payment-protocol/
If SwapManager.percentage was a 0.2 float, rounding differences would
cause an exception in the fee calculation inverse sanity check when entering 20
000 sats into the SwapDialog. By making self.percentage a decimal we can
prevent this kind of issue.
```
File "/home/user/code/vibecoding_vm/electrum/electrum/gui/qt/swap_dialog.py", line 294, in on_send_edited
recv_amount = self.swap_manager.get_recv_amount(send_amount, is_reverse=self.is_reverse)
File "/home/user/code/vibecoding_vm/electrum/electrum/submarine_swaps.py", line 1320, in get_recv_amount
if abs(send_amount - inverted_send_amount) > 1:
~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'int' and 'NoneType'
```
davide
ThomasV