- could not find a single project that still actually cares about bip70 [0]
- well except maybe BitPay.
- but I cannot test with BitPay:
- they have a testnet3 staging environment on test.bitpay.com
- but the SSL cert they use for bip70 has expired in 2021
- the webUI probably also has not been updated since then...
- they claim to have added LN support in 2022 in a blog post,
but it's not there on test.bitpay.com
- on mainnet, they require KYC before payment
- < ... angry noises >
- their loss then, I don't care.
- this is code that no one wants to maintain
- this does not yet delete the signed bip70 payment data for historical txs
- but it is no longer possible to export it from the GUI
[0]: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/bip70-payment-protocol/
Source tarballs
✓ These tarballs should be reproducible, meaning you should be able to generate distributables that match the official releases.
This assumes an Ubuntu (x86_64) host, but it should not be too hard to adapt to another similar system.
We distribute two tarballs, a "normal" one (the default, recommended for users), and a strictly source-only one (for Linux distro packagers). The normal tarball, in addition to including everything from the source-only one, also includes:
- compiled (
.mo) locale files (in addition to source.polocale files) - compiled (
_pb2.py) protobuf files (in addition to source.protofiles) - the
packages/folder containing source-only pure-python runtime dependencies
Build steps
-
Install Docker
(worth reading even if you already have docker)
-
Build tarball
(set envvar
OMIT_UNCLEAN_FILES=1to build the "source-only" tarball)$ ./build.shIf you want reproducibility, try instead e.g.:
$ ELECBUILD_COMMIT=HEAD ELECBUILD_NOCACHE=1 ./build.sh $ ELECBUILD_COMMIT=HEAD ELECBUILD_NOCACHE=1 OMIT_UNCLEAN_FILES=1 ./build.sh -
The generated distributables are in
./dist.
Differences between the sourceonly vs "normal" tar.gz
These scripts can either build a source-only or a "normal" tarball. The official release process builds both.
The source-only tarball is aimed at Linux distro packagers. Users wanting to run from source should typically use the normal tarball.
The differences are as follows:
- the normal tarball bundles all the pure-python dependencies of Electrum.
These are placed into the
packages/folder, and they are automatically found and used at runtime. - the normal tarball includes compiled (.mo) locale files, the source-only tarball does not.
Both tarballs contain (.po) source locale files. If you are packaging for a Linux distro,
you probably want to compile the .mo locale files yourself (see
contrib/locale/build_locale.sh).