bb8c73cabd
```
229.18 | E | gui.qt.main_window.[test_segwit_2] | on_error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "...\electrum\gui\qt\util.py", line 917, in run
result = task.task()
File "...\electrum\gui\qt\send_tab.py", line 681, in broadcast_thread
if self.payto_e.payment_identifier.has_expired():
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'has_expired'
```
In SendTab.broadcast_transaction.broadcast_thread, self.payto_e.payment_identifier was referenced -
but do_clear() has already cleared it by then.
E.g. consider SendTab.pay_onchain_dialog: it calls save_pending_invoice(), which calls do_clear(),
and later (in sign_done), it calls window.broadcast_or_show, which will call SendTab.broadcast_transaction().
As there might be multiple independent transaction dialogs open simultaneously, the single shared state
send_tab.payto_e.payment_identifier approach was problematic -- I think it is conceptually nicer to
pass around the payment_identifiers as needed, as done with this change.
However, this change is not a full proper fix, as it still somewhat relies on
send_tab.payto_e.payment_identifier (e.g. in pay_onchain_dialog). Hence, e.g. when using
the invoice_list context menu "Pay..." item, as payto_e.payment_identifier is not set,
payment_identifier will be None in broadcast_transaction.
but at least we handle PI being None gracefully -- before this change, broadcast_transaction
expected PI to be set, and it was never set to the correct thing (as do_clear() already ran by then):
depending on timing it was either None or a new empty PI. In the former case, producing the above
traceback and hard failing (not only for bip70 stuff!), and in the latter, silently ignoring the logic bug.
117 KiB
117 KiB