Bound registrations with a per-IP quota instead of failure backoff (B-58)

The registration throttle called record_failure on every attempt, successful
ones included. Five legitimate signups from one shared or NAT address locked the
sixth real user out for up to 600s, doubling from there — while an attacker
sidestepped the limiter entirely through B-54. Failure backoff is the wrong
instrument here: nothing about creating an account is a failed guess at a
secret, so the only people it reliably punished were the honest ones.

RollingQuota says what was actually meant: 5 accounts per IP per hour, in a
rolling window. The caller over it waits exactly until the oldest of the five
ages out — an accurate Retry-After, and waiting never makes the next wait
longer. It is recorded only once an account exists, so attempts that create
nothing (a taken username, a validation error) leave the quota untouched, and
checked before the Argon2 hash, so an IP out of quota costs nothing to refuse.

Bounded like the failure limiter (B-56): the keys are caller-chosen, so the dict
gets both a sweep and a hard cap, evicting keys with room left in their quota
before full ones.

Also fixes the inline comment that cited B-31 (the resubscribe finding) where it
meant B-33.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-03 22:32:20 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 57721355f0
commit 0aac73e557
6 changed files with 183 additions and 25 deletions
-14
View File
@@ -40,20 +40,6 @@ remains the last prerequisite for running unattended.
## High — security
### B-58 — the registration throttle counts successes as failures and is IP-only
`app/auth/routes.py:66-71`.
`record_failure` is called on every registration attempt, successful ones
included. Five legitimate signups from one shared/NAT address lock the sixth real
user out with exponential backoff up to 600 s — while an attacker skips the limiter
entirely through B-54. The intent (bounding accounts per source) is reasonable;
the current shape punishes only honest users. The inline comment also cites B-31
(the resubscribe finding) where it means B-33.
Fix: keep an accounts-per-IP quota if that is the goal, but express it as a quota
rather than as failure backoff, and fix the B-nn reference.
### B-59 — deposit crediting is not corroborated, unlike external-spend detection
`app/deposits/service.py:31-45`, `app/electrum/listener.py:401-433`.
+3 -3
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The user communicates in Italian in chat — reply to them in Italian. Everythin
## Project status
All 10 stages of the original build order are code-complete and unit-tested — 290 tests, all under `tests/unit/` (`tests/integration/` is an empty package). Beyond them: Docker + Caddy deployment, admin dashboard (`/admin`), static test UI (`/`), pending-inclusive balance display, an SSE push channel layered over the original polling, self-service password change + admin password reset, and the reconciliation/corroboration machinery below.
All 10 stages of the original build order are code-complete and unit-tested — 296 tests, all under `tests/unit/` (`tests/integration/` is an empty package). Beyond them: Docker + Caddy deployment, admin dashboard (`/admin`), static test UI (`/`), pending-inclusive balance display, an SSE push channel layered over the original polling, self-service password change + admin password reset, and the reconciliation/corroboration machinery below.
Verified on mainnet with real money: registration + address derivation, deposit crediting (1-conf), a real 10 PLM bet (broadcast → confirmed → change credited back), and one full round cycle (close → draw on a real block hash → 70/30 payout with sat math checked against the broadcast tx → confirmation → close → next round auto-opened). **Withdrawal and the RBF bump path have never been exercised against a live broadcast** — unit-tested only.
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ PYTHONPATH=. python scripts/decrypt_master_key.py # ops recovery: decrypt+pr
PYTHONPATH=. python scripts/encrypt_master_key.py # ops bootstrap: import an externally-generated xprv (--overwrite to replace)
PYTHONPATH=. python scripts/electrum_smoke_test.py # manual check: connect, handshake, subscribe to headers, print the tip
python -m pytest # all 290 tests
python -m pytest # all 296 tests
python -m pytest tests/unit/test_hd.py # one file
python -m pytest tests/unit/test_hd.py::test_derivation_is_deterministic # one test
```
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ Accepted **by design** — distinct from the audit findings above (all fixed), w
- **Withdrawal and RBF bump are unit-tested but never live-broadcast** (failure and rollback branches included — still not a real network).
- **No user-facing history.** `GET /users/me/last-round-result` covers exactly one case (the reveal backstop above). Admin has `/admin/rounds`, `/admin/pending-transactions`, `/admin/audit-log`; a user has no equivalent — a failed withdrawal leaves a `failed` row they can never see, which argues for closing this.
- **Admin auth is one shared bearer token** (`ADMIN_TOKEN`) with no per-admin identity: `audit_log` records *what* changed (config edits as `config_updated`, with before/after) but never *who* did it. It gates the user list, privkey export, password resets and history, so a leak is high-blast-radius.
- **No rate limiting anywhere** (register, bet, withdrawal, admin, SSE). For login this is a blocker, not a gap — tracked as B-33.
- **No rate limiting on bet, withdrawal, admin or SSE.** Login has a per-username + per-IP failure throttle and registration a per-IP quota of 5 accounts/hour (`app/auth/rate_limit.py`: `RateLimiter` for failed guesses at a secret, `RollingQuota` for "how many of these may one source create" — B-33, B-58); everything else is unlimited.
- **`/guida` and `/report-bug` are placeholders** (`app/static/guida.html`, `report-bug.html`) — links work, content is "coming soon".
- **No integration tests against a live Electrum connection.** `tests/integration/` is empty; live verification has all been manual (`scripts/electrum_smoke_test.py`, ad hoc scripts, real mainnet txs).
- **Single-process assumptions**: the SSE broadcaster and the per-user locks are in-process only. A multi-worker deployment needs a shared channel and a DB/Redis lock. The round-uniqueness invariant is *not* in this category — it's a DB index.
+84 -1
View File
@@ -110,6 +110,84 @@ class RateLimiter:
self._buckets.pop(key, None)
class RollingQuota:
"""How many times a key may do something in a rolling window — as opposed to
RateLimiter above, which punishes *failures* with a growing delay.
B-58: registration was throttled with the failure limiter, and recorded a
"failure" on every attempt, successful ones included. Five legitimate signups
from one shared or NAT address locked the sixth real user out for up to 600s,
with the backoff doubling from there — while an attacker sidestepped the whole
thing through B-54. The intent (bound how many accounts one source can create)
is right; failure backoff is the wrong instrument for it, since nothing here is
a failed guess at a secret. A quota says exactly what is meant: this many
accounts per source per window, and the answer to the one over it is "not yet",
with an accurate wait rather than a punishment that grows.
"""
def __init__(
self,
limit: int,
window_seconds: float,
max_keys: int = _MAX_BUCKETS,
sweep_interval_seconds: float = _SWEEP_INTERVAL_SECONDS,
) -> None:
self._limit = limit
self._window_seconds = window_seconds
self._max_keys = max_keys
self._sweep_interval_seconds = sweep_interval_seconds
self._events: dict[str, list[float]] = {}
self._last_sweep_at = time.monotonic()
def _live_events(self, key: str, now: float) -> list[float]:
"""The key's events still inside the window, pruned in place."""
events = self._events.get(key)
if events is None:
return []
cutoff = now - self._window_seconds
while events and events[0] <= cutoff:
events.pop(0)
if not events:
del self._events[key]
return events
def _prune(self, now: float) -> None:
# Same bound as RateLimiter (B-56): the keys are caller-chosen, so the dict
# needs both a sweep and a hard cap. Eviction order is likewise "closest to
# leaving the window first" — dropping a key with room left in its quota
# changes nothing, dropping a full one hands out free accounts.
for key in list(self._events):
self._live_events(key, now)
self._last_sweep_at = now
excess = len(self._events) - self._max_keys
if excess > 0:
by_oldest = sorted(self._events.items(), key=lambda item: item[1][-1])
for key, _ in by_oldest[:excess]:
del self._events[key]
def retry_after(self, key: str) -> float:
"""Seconds until this key may act again — 0 while it is under quota."""
now = time.monotonic()
events = self._live_events(key, now)
if len(events) < self._limit:
return 0.0
return events[0] + self._window_seconds - now
def record(self, key: str) -> None:
"""Counts one *completed* action. Attempts that create nothing (a taken
username, a validation error) deliberately don't consume the quota — the
limit is on accounts that exist, not on requests."""
now = time.monotonic()
if now - self._last_sweep_at >= self._sweep_interval_seconds or len(self._events) > self._max_keys:
self._prune(now)
self._events.setdefault(key, []).append(now)
_REGISTRATIONS_PER_IP = 5
_REGISTRATION_WINDOW_SECONDS = 3600.0
class AuthRateLimiters:
"""The three throttles B-33 needs, bundled so they can live on `app.state`
(like `UserLocks`, see app/tx/locks.py) rather than as module globals.
@@ -124,4 +202,9 @@ class AuthRateLimiters:
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.login = RateLimiter(threshold=5, base_delay=2.0, max_delay=300.0)
self.login_ip = RateLimiter(threshold=20, base_delay=2.0, max_delay=300.0)
self.register_ip = RateLimiter(threshold=5, base_delay=5.0, max_delay=600.0)
# B-58: a quota, not failure backoff — 5 accounts per IP per hour. The one
# over it waits only until the oldest of the five ages out, and a busy NAT
# is slowed rather than locked out for progressively longer.
self.register_ip = RollingQuota(
limit=_REGISTRATIONS_PER_IP, window_seconds=_REGISTRATION_WINDOW_SECONDS
)
+9 -5
View File
@@ -30,10 +30,11 @@ def _rate_limiters(request: Request) -> AuthRateLimiters:
# still catches that). The IP limiter's threshold is deliberately higher
# than the username one: a single account should lock out fast, but a
# shared/NAT IP hosting several genuine users shouldn't be punished for one
# of them mistyping a password a few times. Registration gets its own,
# coarser limiter, IP-only — no username exists yet to key on — mainly to
# bound how many accounts one IP can spin up (B-31), not to protect a
# secret. Lives on app.state (see AuthRateLimiters) rather than a module
# of them mistyping a password a few times. Registration gets its own
# instrument entirely: a per-IP *quota* on accounts created (B-58), since
# bounding how many accounts one source can spin up is not the same problem
# as slowing down guesses at a secret, and failure backoff only punished the
# honest signups. Lives on app.state (see AuthRateLimiters) rather than a module
# global so each app instance gets its own, isolated throttle state.
if not hasattr(request.app.state, "auth_rate_limiters"):
request.app.state.auth_rate_limiters = AuthRateLimiters()
@@ -70,10 +71,12 @@ async def register(
) -> TokenResponse:
limiters = _rate_limiters(request)
ip_key = f"ip:{_client_ip(request)}"
# B-58: checked before the Argon2 hash below, so an IP that's out of quota
# costs nothing to turn away. Recorded only once an account actually exists —
# see the successful path below.
retry_after = limiters.register_ip.retry_after(ip_key)
if retry_after > 0:
raise _rate_limited_error(retry_after)
limiters.register_ip.record_failure(ip_key)
# B-57: case-insensitive, matching the unique index on lower(username) — and
# matching the throttle key below, which has always been lowercased.
@@ -110,6 +113,7 @@ async def register(
) from exc
continue
await session.refresh(user)
limiters.register_ip.record(ip_key) # B-58: one account created, one slot used
request.app.state.electrum_listener.address_for_new_user(user.id, user.address)
return TokenResponse(
access_token=create_access_token(user.id, user.token_version), address=user.address
+37 -1
View File
@@ -112,7 +112,9 @@ async def test_successful_login_resets_the_username_bucket(client):
assert resp.status_code == 200
async def test_registration_is_rate_limited_per_ip(client):
async def test_registration_is_quota_limited_per_ip(client): # B-58
"""Five accounts per IP per hour. The sixth is told to wait, not punished with a
backoff that doubles from there."""
for i in range(5):
resp = await client.post(
"/auth/register", json={"username": f"user{i}", "password": "a-strong-password"}
@@ -168,3 +170,37 @@ async def test_the_database_itself_rejects_a_case_variant(client):
)
with pytest.raises(IntegrityError):
await session.commit()
async def test_failed_registrations_do_not_consume_the_quota(client): # B-58
"""The limit is on accounts that exist, not on requests: record_failure used to
fire on every attempt, so five signups — successful ones included — locked the
sixth real user out for up to 600s from a shared or NAT address. Attempts that
create nothing must leave the quota untouched."""
await _register(client, username="taken")
for _ in range(10):
resp = await client.post(
"/auth/register", json={"username": "taken", "password": "a-strong-password"}
)
assert resp.status_code == 409 # username_taken, no account created
# Four slots left out of five, all still usable.
for i in range(4):
resp = await client.post(
"/auth/register", json={"username": f"genuine{i}", "password": "a-strong-password"}
)
assert resp.status_code == 201
async def test_the_quota_reports_how_long_to_wait(client): # B-58
for i in range(5):
await _register(client, username=f"quotauser{i}", password="a-strong-password")
resp = await client.post(
"/auth/register", json={"username": "one-too-many", "password": "a-strong-password"}
)
assert resp.status_code == 429
retry_after = resp.json()["detail"]["params"]["retry_after_seconds"]
assert 0 < retry_after <= 3601 # bounded by the window, not by a growing penalty
+50 -1
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ matters here is that pruning never hands an attacker a free pass.
import time
from app.auth.rate_limit import RateLimiter
from app.auth.rate_limit import RateLimiter, RollingQuota
def _limiter(**kwargs) -> RateLimiter:
@@ -89,3 +89,52 @@ def test_pruning_does_not_reset_a_live_failure_count():
limiter.record_failure("user:a")
assert limiter.retry_after("user:a") > 0
# --- B-58: registration is a quota, not failure backoff -------------------------
def test_quota_allows_up_to_the_limit_then_asks_for_a_wait():
quota = RollingQuota(limit=3, window_seconds=60.0)
for _ in range(3):
assert quota.retry_after("ip:1") == 0.0
quota.record("ip:1")
wait = quota.retry_after("ip:1")
assert 0 < wait <= 60.0
def test_quota_is_per_key():
quota = RollingQuota(limit=1, window_seconds=60.0)
quota.record("ip:1")
assert quota.retry_after("ip:1") > 0
assert quota.retry_after("ip:2") == 0.0
def test_quota_frees_a_slot_once_the_oldest_event_leaves_the_window():
"""The point of a rolling window over failure backoff: the caller waits exactly
until there's room again, and waiting doesn't make the next wait longer."""
quota = RollingQuota(limit=2, window_seconds=0.05)
quota.record("ip:1")
quota.record("ip:1")
assert quota.retry_after("ip:1") > 0
time.sleep(0.06)
assert quota.retry_after("ip:1") == 0.0
def test_quota_prunes_spent_keys_and_caps_its_dict():
"""Same bound as the failure limiter (B-56): caller-chosen keys, so both a sweep
and a hard cap."""
quota = RollingQuota(limit=1, window_seconds=0.05, sweep_interval_seconds=0.0)
for i in range(50):
quota.record(f"ip:{i}")
time.sleep(0.06)
quota.record("ip:fresh")
assert list(quota._events) == ["ip:fresh"]
capped = RollingQuota(limit=1, window_seconds=3600.0, max_keys=10, sweep_interval_seconds=0.0)
for i in range(200):
capped.record(f"ip:{i}")
assert len(capped._events) <= 11