davideandClaude Opus 5
6246b13247
A candidate external spend has needed a quorum since B-29, but `value` and `height` for a *credit* came from the single active connection and went straight into utxo_events. One hostile or broken server could therefore inflate a user's displayed balance with outpoints that don't exist. It never spends anyone else's coins — a bet or withdrawal built on a phantom UTXO is refused at broadcast and rolled back — but it wedges the balance display and burns build attempts, and on a custodial platform a balance that isn't real is a support incident either way. Balances move in both directions; both directions now need the same quorum. corroborate_utxo_credit asks the other configured servers whether they report the same outpoint, for the same amount, confirmed. The height itself isn't compared: a server still catching up reports height 0 and simply doesn't agree, which is the same answer, while two honest servers can't disagree on the height of a genuinely confirmed outpoint. refresh_user gains the phase that shape already implied: find_new_credit_ candidates (new, confirmed, not already held) inside the first session, corroboration outside any session, then credit_confirmed_utxos over what survived. Only new outpoints are corroborated — re-checking what we already hold would open a connection to every other server on every refresh for an answer that can no longer change anything. A failed corroboration delays a credit, it never loses one: the next scripthash notification or DepositReconciler sweep (300s) re-offers the same outpoint, and the withholding is logged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PLM Lottery
A periodic-round lottery system built on PLM, a Bitcoin-like coin (mainnet). Each user gets a dedicated server-derived P2WPKH address; they deposit PLM to that address, place a fixed-cost bet to enter the current round, and when the round closes a winner is drawn who receives 70% of the prize pool (the remaining 30% goes to fees).
This is a custodial system: private keys are generated and held server-side, encrypted at rest. See CLAUDE.md for the full architecture, domain decisions, and known gaps before treating this as production-ready.
Quick start
The server always runs via Docker (app + Caddy reverse proxy with automatic
TLS) — in dev and production alike, with only SITE_ADDRESS differing
between the two. There's no supported way to run uvicorn directly; the
venv is only for local tooling (tests, Alembic migrations, the one-time key
scripts) — see CLAUDE.md.
cp .env.example .env # then fill in the generated secrets, see docs/setup.md
mkdir -p data/db data/keys data/logs
docker compose run --rm app python scripts/generate_master_key.py
docker compose up -d --build
Open https://localhost/ for the test UI, https://localhost/admin for the
admin dashboard (a self-signed-certificate warning on first visit is
expected in dev — accept it, or use curl -k). The interactive API docs at
/docs are disabled by default (they'd otherwise expose the whole API
surface, admin endpoints included) — set ENABLE_API_DOCS=true in .env to
enable them.
See docs/setup.md and docs/running-the-server.md for the full walkthrough (secrets, master key generation, production TLS with a real domain).
Documentation
- CLAUDE.md — architecture, commands, domain decisions, known gaps (for anyone/anything working on the code)
- flowchart.mmd — the source-of-truth flow diagram the implementation follows node-by-node
- docs/setup.md — one-time setup (secrets, master key, migrations)
- docs/running-the-server.md — how to launch it (local venv vs. Docker+Caddy, dev vs. production TLS)
- docs/guida-utente.md — end-user guide to the test UI (Italian)
- docs/guida-admin.md — admin dashboard guide (Italian)
Tech stack
Python (FastAPI, SQLAlchemy async + Alembic, Argon2 + JWT auth), Electrum protocol for PLM network access (no full node), Docker + Caddy for deployment. See CLAUDE.md for the complete list and the reasoning behind each choice.
Testing
python -m pytest # all tests
python -m pytest tests/unit/test_hd.py # one file
232 unit tests cover HD derivation, PSBT building, the Electrum client, bets, deposits, withdrawals, the round/draw engine, RBF fee-bumping, admin config, the pending-inclusive balance calculation, and the SSE push channel. No automated integration tests against a live Electrum connection — mainnet verification so far has been manual (see CLAUDE.md's "Project status").