The poller and the reconciler matched current_txid only. If an earlier version of a bumped transaction confirmed it was never seen, and after 6h the row was abandoned: a confirmed bet's participant deleted, a sent withdrawal marked failed, a paid payout rebuilt. bump_fee also broadcast in phase 2 and persisted in phase 3 unconditionally, so a crash or a `database is locked` in between left a transaction on the network that the DB did not know, and an abandon or a confirmation in the meantime was overwritten. - New table pending_transaction_txids (migration a3f5c2d9b7e1; txid unique, index on the owning row; existing rows backfilled with current_txid + raw and the txid their last bump replaced, raw_hex empty). Written with the row by place_bet, request_withdrawal and _trigger_payout; removed with a bet row that a verified refusal deletes (DAT-38). - bump_fee in four phases: read, build and sign, commit the replacement as a candidate version, broadcast (verdict of B-76, fanned out when accepted; an explicit refusal raises RbfError and leaves the row), then switch the row over with `UPDATE ... WHERE status='pending' AND current_txid=<replaced>`. Zero rows matched is a logged conflict: nothing is overwritten and the candidate stays recorded. An uncertain broadcast adopts the replacement. A retry rebuilds the same candidate without tripping the unique txid. - poll_once and reconcile_once look for every txid of a row. When the version found is not the current one, broadcast.adopt_version makes it current (raw tx included) and retargets spent_txid, bet_txid, withdrawals.txid and payout_txid as a bump does, before the confirmation handler runs. _release_inputs frees inputs claimed by any version of the row. - RbfBumper takes the listener as `network`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PLM Lottery
A periodic-round lottery system built on PLM, a Bitcoin-like coin (mainnet). Each user gets a dedicated server-derived P2WPKH address; they deposit PLM to that address, place a fixed-cost bet to enter the current round, and when the round closes a winner is drawn who receives 70% of the prize pool (the remaining 30% goes to fees).
This is a custodial system: private keys are generated and held server-side, encrypted at rest. See CLAUDE.md for the full architecture, domain decisions, and known gaps before treating this as production-ready.
Quick start
The server always runs via Docker (app + Caddy reverse proxy with automatic
TLS) — in dev and production alike, with only SITE_ADDRESS differing
between the two. There's no supported way to run uvicorn directly; the
venv is only for local tooling (tests, Alembic migrations, the one-time key
scripts) — see CLAUDE.md.
cp .env.example .env # then fill in the generated secrets, see docs/setup.md
mkdir -p data/db data/keys data/logs
docker compose run --rm app python scripts/generate_master_key.py
docker compose up -d --build
Open https://localhost/ for the test UI, https://localhost/admin for the
admin dashboard (a self-signed-certificate warning on first visit is
expected in dev — accept it, or use curl -k). The interactive API docs at
/docs are disabled by default (they'd otherwise expose the whole API
surface, admin endpoints included) — set ENABLE_API_DOCS=true in .env to
enable them.
See docs/setup.md and docs/running-the-server.md for the full walkthrough (secrets, master key generation, production TLS with a real domain).
Documentation
- CLAUDE.md — architecture, commands, domain decisions, known gaps (for anyone/anything working on the code)
- docs/README.md — index of all documentation (docs-first, single source of truth, one ADR per decision: docs/adr/)
- docs/come-funziona.md — the specification (Italian): how the platform works, with diagrams and traceable requirement IDs; it indexes every per-topic document (flows, architecture, data model, API, security, audit log, operations, decisions and limits, bug history). docs/processo-di-modifica.md describes how a change goes from the spec to the code
- docs/setup.md — one-time setup (secrets, master key, migrations)
- docs/running-the-server.md — how to launch it with Docker+Caddy (dev vs. production TLS)
- docs/guida-utente.md — end-user guide to the test UI (Italian)
- docs/guida-admin.md — admin dashboard guide (Italian)
Tech stack
Python (FastAPI, SQLAlchemy async + Alembic, Argon2 + JWT auth), Electrum protocol for PLM network access (no full node), Docker + Caddy for deployment. See CLAUDE.md for the complete list and the reasoning behind each choice.
Testing
python -m pytest # all tests
python -m pytest tests/unit/test_hd.py # one file
480 unit tests cover HD derivation, PSBT building, the Electrum client, bets, deposits, withdrawals, the round/draw engine, RBF fee-bumping, admin config, the pending-inclusive balance calculation, and the SSE push channel. No automated integration tests against a live Electrum connection — mainnet verification so far has been manual (see CLAUDE.md's "Project status").